this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023

639 points (98.0% liked)

Funny

funny@sh.itjust.works

15,776 readers

5,641 active

240 users here now

General rules:

Be kind.
All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 3 years ago

moderators

TheDude@sh.itjust.works

kersploosh@sh.itjust.works

example@reddthat.com

VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works

Machine learning (files.catbox.moe)

submitted 2 years ago by Masimatutu@lemm.ee to c/funny@sh.itjust.works

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] pfannkuchen_gesicht@lemmy.one 43 points 2 years ago (5 children)

That conversation doesn't make any damn sense. Why would an interviewer ask arithmetic questions to check the ml claim?

hideshow 10 child comments

[–] kirby@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 2 years ago (2 children)

this is a conversation from 2047. the Interviewer is checking if they are speaking with an AI/Robot

parent

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] pfannkuchen_gesicht@lemmy.one 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

Excuse my ignorance, but what 2047?

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] Masimatutu@lemm.ee [S] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

I think they're referring to the year.

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] pfannkuchen_gesicht@lemmy.one 3 points 2 years ago

oh. I thought he might be referring to a book, movie or game.

parent

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago

Shoulda used a Voight-Kampff test.

parent

[–] sparse_neuron@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's basically a joke on how gradient descent works in machine learning.

parent

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] kablammy@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago

It would have been more obviously gradient descent if they didnt start with 0, so the first gradient wasn't the same as the second answer. I thought they were just repeating the last correct answer.

parent

[–] Porka_911@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 years ago

Why ai would be used on a math operator beats me, but hey ho.

parent

[–] xusontha@ls.buckodr.ink 5 points 2 years ago

because

parent

[–] VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

ai: I am detecting numbers, create a variable called Numbersdetected.
int ("Numbersdetected" = 0);
Now it has a value of 16.
write (Numbersdetected = "16");
Somebody wants the value of Numbersdetected.
query ("Numbersdetected");

parent

[–] bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

Blade runner logic. Ask that exposing question. Get an answer.

parent