Donald Trump’s campaign strategist for his 2016 election win says: “I believe we will have a national emergency declared by late August,” ahead of the Congressional midterm elections due on November 3. “You will have enough evidence by mid-August to show that we have a massive problem” of election fraud, he tells me in an interview. Trump’s televised address to the nation on Thursday last week was the beginning of the process, he says.

The president declassified documents, which he claimed show “shocking vulnerabilities in our election infrastructure” revealed by the 2020 election.

These had been hidden, even from him, by a “deep state” conspiracy of US intelligence services, he posited.

Trump demanded that the Congress pass a bill called the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility, or SAVE, Act. The bill stipulates that all voters produce a passport or birth certificate to be eligible to vote. Democrats denounce it as an effort at mass disenfranchisement. The Brennan Centre for Justice at New York University estimates that it could block 21 million Americans from the ballot box.

Under the US Constitution, it’s the states, not the federal government, that run elections. The SAVE Act would force state governments to hand voter roll information to Washington.

Trump sent his Homeland Security Secretary, Markwayne Mullin, out the following morning to issue a threat to state officials: they could face prison time unless they followed the administration’s orders to remove non-citizens from rolls.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Elections are done by the states, as clearly outlined in the Constitution. If Red states want to opt out, they're welcome to do that, but the Blue states (and most Red ones) are going to have their elections anyway, and they will count.

All the rest of it is just smoke.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    The point is to force an constitutional crisis to allow the Supreme Court to rubber stamp the coup.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    The Supreme Court has been fairly unpredictable, which is a problem for Trump, but the bigger problem is that they've been VERY predictable when it comes to a direct challenge to the Constitution. It's one thing when it's an interpretation of the an amendment, it's another thing when it's a downright challenge, like Birthright Citizenship.

    I doubt the Supreme Court is going to just ignore the 22md Amendment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 hours ago

    Well Ol' Lumpty Trumpty just declared that he plans on running again. Setting aside the delusions of a President who's brain is rotting away.

    The way I see is that a red state not participating or a purple/blue state with very incredible baseless claims of fraud is what going to kick off the crisis.

    First scenario, a red state or states don't participate. A red state or a coalition of red states file a claim saying that you can't have an election without us as our electoral votes were never assigned to a Presidential candidate. If there is no election, then the President Mush For Brains is still President pending a proper election.

    Second scenario, a blue state or states or purple state is accused of having massive fraud in their elections. Once again, the baseless fraud claims end up in the Supreme Court with the same issue as the first scenario with a twist. Republicans will say that we can't trust these election results therefore the election is invalid. If the election is invalid, President Mush is still President.

    One of the goals of the Republicans is to run out the clock such as what happened in the 2000 Florida Recount and the Brooks Brothers riot.

    As far as I am aware, the US Constitution is silent on what happens when election chicanery at this scale happens.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago

    Also, they will never allow anything that takes away their own power. Even in their blanket presidential immunity ruling they reserved for themselves the power to decide what counts as an official act.

  • source
  • parent