▲ 1488 ▼ Centrist bullshit (discuss.online) submitted 2 days ago by VetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world 239 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] picklerick@lemmy.ml -33 points 2 days ago (1 child) not good, he'll return to the center eventually to restore todays status quo. he's just wearing a mask for now permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] vzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children) He said he’d do X. People voted him to do X. He’s doing X. What is your actual problem with the guy? “He might do Y”, where Y is what you would be getting with any other candidate anyway, seems like a weird thing to worry about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 2 days ago But but everyone else said X can't be done, and he did X, what kind of monster is he? permalink fedilink source parent [+] picklerick@lemmy.ml -32 points 2 days ago (3 children) hes only doin x for now. the bourgeoisie are playing the long game here man, nothing short of a full communist revo will stop capitalist pigs permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Carmakazi@piefed.social 21 points 2 days ago Do you have a rifle ready to fight that fight? Do you even live here? Or is it just fun to wish for blood in someone else's streets? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 11 points 2 days ago This is the dumbest shit I've read all week. The bourgeoisie already had their game locked down. That's why they wanted Cuomo and after Mamdani beat him once the bourgeoisie still backed Cuomo in hopes of the second time going differently. The bourgeoisie didn't need Mamdani to get what they want. Of they wanted to use Mamdani as an example that left populist policies don't work then Mamdani shouldn't be winning this much. If Mamdani does X and then in the future becomes Y then nobody is going to think socialism is a failure, they're going to view Mamdani as a traitor the same way they view Fetterman as a traitor. You have to sniff some heavy duty conspiracy glue to believe Mamdani is some kind of a capitalist plant. It's far more likely you've been radicalized to a point where anything less than a full blown revolution is not a step in the right direction. That's not healthy. permalink fedilink source parent [–] aaa999@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago .ml also, ok, what happened to sinema, what's gonna happen to fetterman, etc. even in your made up hypothetical there's a very easy solution that everyone here except you can see because it is real and it happened it isn't in state and revolution but it is in observable reality permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children) He said he’d do X. People voted him to do X. He’s doing X. What is your actual problem with the guy? “He might do Y”, where Y is what you would be getting with any other candidate anyway, seems like a weird thing to worry about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 2 days ago But but everyone else said X can't be done, and he did X, what kind of monster is he? permalink fedilink source parent [+] picklerick@lemmy.ml -32 points 2 days ago (3 children) hes only doin x for now. the bourgeoisie are playing the long game here man, nothing short of a full communist revo will stop capitalist pigs permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Carmakazi@piefed.social 21 points 2 days ago Do you have a rifle ready to fight that fight? Do you even live here? Or is it just fun to wish for blood in someone else's streets? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 11 points 2 days ago This is the dumbest shit I've read all week. The bourgeoisie already had their game locked down. That's why they wanted Cuomo and after Mamdani beat him once the bourgeoisie still backed Cuomo in hopes of the second time going differently. The bourgeoisie didn't need Mamdani to get what they want. Of they wanted to use Mamdani as an example that left populist policies don't work then Mamdani shouldn't be winning this much. If Mamdani does X and then in the future becomes Y then nobody is going to think socialism is a failure, they're going to view Mamdani as a traitor the same way they view Fetterman as a traitor. You have to sniff some heavy duty conspiracy glue to believe Mamdani is some kind of a capitalist plant. It's far more likely you've been radicalized to a point where anything less than a full blown revolution is not a step in the right direction. That's not healthy. permalink fedilink source parent [–] aaa999@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago .ml also, ok, what happened to sinema, what's gonna happen to fetterman, etc. even in your made up hypothetical there's a very easy solution that everyone here except you can see because it is real and it happened it isn't in state and revolution but it is in observable reality permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 2 days ago But but everyone else said X can't be done, and he did X, what kind of monster is he? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] picklerick@lemmy.ml -32 points 2 days ago (3 children) hes only doin x for now. the bourgeoisie are playing the long game here man, nothing short of a full communist revo will stop capitalist pigs permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Carmakazi@piefed.social 21 points 2 days ago Do you have a rifle ready to fight that fight? Do you even live here? Or is it just fun to wish for blood in someone else's streets? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 11 points 2 days ago This is the dumbest shit I've read all week. The bourgeoisie already had their game locked down. That's why they wanted Cuomo and after Mamdani beat him once the bourgeoisie still backed Cuomo in hopes of the second time going differently. The bourgeoisie didn't need Mamdani to get what they want. Of they wanted to use Mamdani as an example that left populist policies don't work then Mamdani shouldn't be winning this much. If Mamdani does X and then in the future becomes Y then nobody is going to think socialism is a failure, they're going to view Mamdani as a traitor the same way they view Fetterman as a traitor. You have to sniff some heavy duty conspiracy glue to believe Mamdani is some kind of a capitalist plant. It's far more likely you've been radicalized to a point where anything less than a full blown revolution is not a step in the right direction. That's not healthy. permalink fedilink source parent [–] aaa999@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago .ml also, ok, what happened to sinema, what's gonna happen to fetterman, etc. even in your made up hypothetical there's a very easy solution that everyone here except you can see because it is real and it happened it isn't in state and revolution but it is in observable reality permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Carmakazi@piefed.social 21 points 2 days ago Do you have a rifle ready to fight that fight? Do you even live here? Or is it just fun to wish for blood in someone else's streets? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 11 points 2 days ago This is the dumbest shit I've read all week. The bourgeoisie already had their game locked down. That's why they wanted Cuomo and after Mamdani beat him once the bourgeoisie still backed Cuomo in hopes of the second time going differently. The bourgeoisie didn't need Mamdani to get what they want. Of they wanted to use Mamdani as an example that left populist policies don't work then Mamdani shouldn't be winning this much. If Mamdani does X and then in the future becomes Y then nobody is going to think socialism is a failure, they're going to view Mamdani as a traitor the same way they view Fetterman as a traitor. You have to sniff some heavy duty conspiracy glue to believe Mamdani is some kind of a capitalist plant. It's far more likely you've been radicalized to a point where anything less than a full blown revolution is not a step in the right direction. That's not healthy. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] aaa999@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago .ml also, ok, what happened to sinema, what's gonna happen to fetterman, etc. even in your made up hypothetical there's a very easy solution that everyone here except you can see because it is real and it happened it isn't in state and revolution but it is in observable reality permalink fedilink source parent
