▲ 291 ▼ Russia changes laws ahead of new mobilization and possible unrest (tvpworld.com) submitted 1 week ago by EatingOnions@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world 118 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] doben@lemmy.ml -13 points 1 week ago (2 children) The source is an US-American pro-war think tank. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] dbdr@nord.pub 13 points 1 week ago* (1 child) It's ironical how russia shills will call everyone defending against russia "pro-war" instead of the one who actually decided to start the war, Putin, when no one was going to invade russia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] doben@lemmy.ml -13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 child) It‘s even more ironic, how fried some of your minds are, that your very first reflex is to discredit someone stating facts against false statements as „Russia shills“, followed by the most basic excuse of an argument about who started this mess we’re in, while also completely ignoring the roles of western interests. It‘s so overly simplistic and reductive, that it hurts. Also, stating facts about a source and the nature of said source certainly is not in defense of anyone. Check your rabid impulses, my friend. Hate on Russia all you want, if you think that‘s a good use of your rage. But the moment you start whining about opposition to the default western narrative, you‘ve become nothing other than complicit in their supression. Be proud! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (1 child) Found the guy who believes in NATO expansion, Western agression, and Ukraine de-Nazification. Now that hundreds of thousand of your fellow brothers and sisters are dead are you satisfied. Or do you need moar deaths to satisfy your propaganda addled mind. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] doben@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 week ago (1 child) Sure. But what's your opinion about the quality of the source? And do you think it's good to call out bad sources? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* Obviously it is not a Russian friendly source. Since I am not from Poland I don't have a lot of insight. There is plenty of criticism of it before the 2023 restructure basically amounting to it being a mouthpiece for Polish state propaganda. I am not a fan of attacking the messenger, but I can understand why people do it. Everything is essentially propaganda so it is important to be able to analyze it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 child) Ruzzia is the one that is especially pro war. They invaded. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] doben@lemmy.ml -10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 child) Okay? The source is still shit. E: And do you think the US and EU are anti-war? E2: What's with the ZZ, your blind hate makes you act like a 12 year old. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 week ago (1 child) God i hate you ml putin cock suckers so much permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] doben@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago So, is the source shit or not? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dbdr@nord.pub 13 points 1 week ago* (1 child) It's ironical how russia shills will call everyone defending against russia "pro-war" instead of the one who actually decided to start the war, Putin, when no one was going to invade russia. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] doben@lemmy.ml -13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 child) It‘s even more ironic, how fried some of your minds are, that your very first reflex is to discredit someone stating facts against false statements as „Russia shills“, followed by the most basic excuse of an argument about who started this mess we’re in, while also completely ignoring the roles of western interests. It‘s so overly simplistic and reductive, that it hurts. Also, stating facts about a source and the nature of said source certainly is not in defense of anyone. Check your rabid impulses, my friend. Hate on Russia all you want, if you think that‘s a good use of your rage. But the moment you start whining about opposition to the default western narrative, you‘ve become nothing other than complicit in their supression. Be proud! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (1 child) Found the guy who believes in NATO expansion, Western agression, and Ukraine de-Nazification. Now that hundreds of thousand of your fellow brothers and sisters are dead are you satisfied. Or do you need moar deaths to satisfy your propaganda addled mind. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] doben@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 week ago (1 child) Sure. But what's your opinion about the quality of the source? And do you think it's good to call out bad sources? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* Obviously it is not a Russian friendly source. Since I am not from Poland I don't have a lot of insight. There is plenty of criticism of it before the 2023 restructure basically amounting to it being a mouthpiece for Polish state propaganda. I am not a fan of attacking the messenger, but I can understand why people do it. Everything is essentially propaganda so it is important to be able to analyze it. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] doben@lemmy.ml -13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 child) It‘s even more ironic, how fried some of your minds are, that your very first reflex is to discredit someone stating facts against false statements as „Russia shills“, followed by the most basic excuse of an argument about who started this mess we’re in, while also completely ignoring the roles of western interests. It‘s so overly simplistic and reductive, that it hurts. Also, stating facts about a source and the nature of said source certainly is not in defense of anyone. Check your rabid impulses, my friend. Hate on Russia all you want, if you think that‘s a good use of your rage. But the moment you start whining about opposition to the default western narrative, you‘ve become nothing other than complicit in their supression. Be proud! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (1 child) Found the guy who believes in NATO expansion, Western agression, and Ukraine de-Nazification. Now that hundreds of thousand of your fellow brothers and sisters are dead are you satisfied. Or do you need moar deaths to satisfy your propaganda addled mind. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] doben@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 week ago (1 child) Sure. But what's your opinion about the quality of the source? And do you think it's good to call out bad sources? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* Obviously it is not a Russian friendly source. Since I am not from Poland I don't have a lot of insight. There is plenty of criticism of it before the 2023 restructure basically amounting to it being a mouthpiece for Polish state propaganda. I am not a fan of attacking the messenger, but I can understand why people do it. Everything is essentially propaganda so it is important to be able to analyze it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (1 child) Found the guy who believes in NATO expansion, Western agression, and Ukraine de-Nazification. Now that hundreds of thousand of your fellow brothers and sisters are dead are you satisfied. Or do you need moar deaths to satisfy your propaganda addled mind. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] doben@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 week ago (1 child) Sure. But what's your opinion about the quality of the source? And do you think it's good to call out bad sources? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* Obviously it is not a Russian friendly source. Since I am not from Poland I don't have a lot of insight. There is plenty of criticism of it before the 2023 restructure basically amounting to it being a mouthpiece for Polish state propaganda. I am not a fan of attacking the messenger, but I can understand why people do it. Everything is essentially propaganda so it is important to be able to analyze it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] doben@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 week ago (1 child) Sure. But what's your opinion about the quality of the source? And do you think it's good to call out bad sources? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* Obviously it is not a Russian friendly source. Since I am not from Poland I don't have a lot of insight. There is plenty of criticism of it before the 2023 restructure basically amounting to it being a mouthpiece for Polish state propaganda. I am not a fan of attacking the messenger, but I can understand why people do it. Everything is essentially propaganda so it is important to be able to analyze it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* Obviously it is not a Russian friendly source. Since I am not from Poland I don't have a lot of insight. There is plenty of criticism of it before the 2023 restructure basically amounting to it being a mouthpiece for Polish state propaganda. I am not a fan of attacking the messenger, but I can understand why people do it. Everything is essentially propaganda so it is important to be able to analyze it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 child) Ruzzia is the one that is especially pro war. They invaded. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] doben@lemmy.ml -10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 child) Okay? The source is still shit. E: And do you think the US and EU are anti-war? E2: What's with the ZZ, your blind hate makes you act like a 12 year old. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 week ago (1 child) God i hate you ml putin cock suckers so much permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] doben@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago So, is the source shit or not? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] doben@lemmy.ml -10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 child) Okay? The source is still shit. E: And do you think the US and EU are anti-war? E2: What's with the ZZ, your blind hate makes you act like a 12 year old. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 week ago (1 child) God i hate you ml putin cock suckers so much permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] doben@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago So, is the source shit or not? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 week ago (1 child) God i hate you ml putin cock suckers so much permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] doben@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago So, is the source shit or not? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] doben@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago So, is the source shit or not? permalink fedilink source parent