So if you voted blue no matter who to the point that Democrats controlled the house, this would’ve never passed.
This seems like a perverse incentive to never actually protect vulnerable minorities. If their rights are forfeit as soon as a republican gets into office, democrats can hold that over their heads forever as long as they don't actually put any protections in place. A lack of protections at a national level is what allows momentum to build against progress as red states put in their own discriminatory laws.
But if you don’t vote because the “blue” doesn’t pass the test, then the Republican wins and you get everything you hated about the blue and a whole lot of other shitty stuff.
It would be nice if the margins between the lesser and greater evil didn't narrow every time. One of the pieces of shit you're defending, Henry Cuellar, voted with you and against trans people. He had a primary opponent back in 2022. Jessica Cisneros. Party leadership openly campaigned for the anti-trans anti-choice anti-worker pro-nra Henry Cuellar instead, saying that they have to protect incumbents. Two years later, when Cori Bush and Jamaal Bowman were up for re-election, the party didn't protect them against the challengers AIPAC bought.
VOTE IN THE PRIMARY FOR WHAT YOU WANT.
THIS IS JUST GLOATING THAT THE PARTY INTERFERES IN THE PRIMARIES.