It's not that I don't get the appeal of having larger artwork. But the medium itself in the way it's used and produced doesn't make sense. The whole audio production pipeline is digital. Producers take analogue audio, introduce quantisation and digitisation errors immediately to be able to use their fancy computers to produce the music (which introduces even more errors due to all filters being digital) just to then dump that digital piece of sound into an analogue medium at the very end. Nothing is gained except the digital-analogue-conversion happens before creating the medium whereas with CDs you do it after reading from that medium. Which is a stupid idea, as dust and other issues will then mess with the result you're hearing.

Now, if you're a producer that actually uses an all-analogue workflow, ignore this, I don't mean you. You also have my deepest respect for enduring that pain. Please point me towards some records that actually did this though.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 1 week ago* (1 child)

I don't have your answer, but what you said mirrors what happened when music on cd came out. The discs would be marked DDD or AAD to designate whether they had used an all digital pathway (DDD) which was the holy grail, but opposite of what you seek. Recorded digital, Mixed digital, Mastered digitally or analog. Spars codes. Wild. Now my cds are in a box in the attic.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments