▲ 488 ▼ Pluralism go brrr (media.piefed.zip) submitted 2 weeks ago by Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world 61 comments fedilink hide all child comments cross-posted from: https://piefed.zip/c/leftymemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com/p/1650861/pluralism-go-brrr
[+] teslasaur@lemmy.world -7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children) Nope. Just blessed with the ability to summarize ideologies in a succinct fashion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* Pack it up, friends. Teslasaur has defeated hundreds of years of anarchist political theory, it's all over for us. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) If by " summarize ideologies in a succinct fashion" you mean "be completely wrong and lack any understanding of the ideology" the sure. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -4 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) The shorthand of "libertarianism, but even more ludicrous" sums it up well. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) Cool, so you're just ignorant and proudly so. Gotcha. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children) Oh, do enlighten me what part of the statement is untrue and start from there. Instead of going to name calling. Anarchism is absolutely part of libertarianism, so that is check one. Ludicrous, because of it's inherent opposition to structure undermines the idea of a coherent framework of ideals in a society. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago https://www.anarchistfaq.org/afaq/sectionA.html https://www.anarchistfaq.org/afaq/sectionF.html permalink fedilink source parent [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child) Keep on showcasing how ignorant you are. Go read a book, child. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) I've read plenty of them, but please. Bring your own interpretation instead of being a little condescending brat. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child) Mhm, sure you have, bubba. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children) Indeed I have, but please keep embarrassing yourself by not even countering and just going to name calling. I suggest reading "Debt" by David Graeber to get a better understanding of the economic effect in social structures. There are plenty of examples of historical societies that have attempted and failed at anarchy. Most of them fail when the people that do the work society needs, get used by those that do not work, eventually leading to violence. That violence goes in opposition of the social agreement, although not necessarily, as there is nothing inherent about anarchism that would hinder violence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago David Graeber was an anarchist, it is in the second line of his Wikipedia. Also he talks about it in bullshit jobs a bit. You really are doing yourself no favors here, go read some books. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago* (1 child) I have read Debt, as well as Dawn of Everything plus Bullshit Jobs, also by the late prominent anarchist political activist and cultural anthropologist, David Graeber. The irony that you didn't understand that those books are in support of Anarchism. You clearly didn't understand anything about what you read. Keep embarrassing yourself. You're doing great at it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) From that book I understood that anarchism is not going to work. From the words of an anarchist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child) Then you understood nothing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago Or we have different perspectives. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* Pack it up, friends. Teslasaur has defeated hundreds of years of anarchist political theory, it's all over for us. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) If by " summarize ideologies in a succinct fashion" you mean "be completely wrong and lack any understanding of the ideology" the sure. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -4 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) The shorthand of "libertarianism, but even more ludicrous" sums it up well. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) Cool, so you're just ignorant and proudly so. Gotcha. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children) Oh, do enlighten me what part of the statement is untrue and start from there. Instead of going to name calling. Anarchism is absolutely part of libertarianism, so that is check one. Ludicrous, because of it's inherent opposition to structure undermines the idea of a coherent framework of ideals in a society. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago https://www.anarchistfaq.org/afaq/sectionA.html https://www.anarchistfaq.org/afaq/sectionF.html permalink fedilink source parent [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child) Keep on showcasing how ignorant you are. Go read a book, child. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) I've read plenty of them, but please. Bring your own interpretation instead of being a little condescending brat. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child) Mhm, sure you have, bubba. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children) Indeed I have, but please keep embarrassing yourself by not even countering and just going to name calling. I suggest reading "Debt" by David Graeber to get a better understanding of the economic effect in social structures. There are plenty of examples of historical societies that have attempted and failed at anarchy. Most of them fail when the people that do the work society needs, get used by those that do not work, eventually leading to violence. That violence goes in opposition of the social agreement, although not necessarily, as there is nothing inherent about anarchism that would hinder violence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago David Graeber was an anarchist, it is in the second line of his Wikipedia. Also he talks about it in bullshit jobs a bit. You really are doing yourself no favors here, go read some books. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago* (1 child) I have read Debt, as well as Dawn of Everything plus Bullshit Jobs, also by the late prominent anarchist political activist and cultural anthropologist, David Graeber. The irony that you didn't understand that those books are in support of Anarchism. You clearly didn't understand anything about what you read. Keep embarrassing yourself. You're doing great at it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) From that book I understood that anarchism is not going to work. From the words of an anarchist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child) Then you understood nothing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago Or we have different perspectives. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -4 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) The shorthand of "libertarianism, but even more ludicrous" sums it up well. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) Cool, so you're just ignorant and proudly so. Gotcha. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children) Oh, do enlighten me what part of the statement is untrue and start from there. Instead of going to name calling. Anarchism is absolutely part of libertarianism, so that is check one. Ludicrous, because of it's inherent opposition to structure undermines the idea of a coherent framework of ideals in a society. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago https://www.anarchistfaq.org/afaq/sectionA.html https://www.anarchistfaq.org/afaq/sectionF.html permalink fedilink source parent [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child) Keep on showcasing how ignorant you are. Go read a book, child. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) I've read plenty of them, but please. Bring your own interpretation instead of being a little condescending brat. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child) Mhm, sure you have, bubba. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children) Indeed I have, but please keep embarrassing yourself by not even countering and just going to name calling. I suggest reading "Debt" by David Graeber to get a better understanding of the economic effect in social structures. There are plenty of examples of historical societies that have attempted and failed at anarchy. Most of them fail when the people that do the work society needs, get used by those that do not work, eventually leading to violence. That violence goes in opposition of the social agreement, although not necessarily, as there is nothing inherent about anarchism that would hinder violence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago David Graeber was an anarchist, it is in the second line of his Wikipedia. Also he talks about it in bullshit jobs a bit. You really are doing yourself no favors here, go read some books. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago* (1 child) I have read Debt, as well as Dawn of Everything plus Bullshit Jobs, also by the late prominent anarchist political activist and cultural anthropologist, David Graeber. The irony that you didn't understand that those books are in support of Anarchism. You clearly didn't understand anything about what you read. Keep embarrassing yourself. You're doing great at it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) From that book I understood that anarchism is not going to work. From the words of an anarchist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child) Then you understood nothing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago Or we have different perspectives. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) Cool, so you're just ignorant and proudly so. Gotcha. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children) Oh, do enlighten me what part of the statement is untrue and start from there. Instead of going to name calling. Anarchism is absolutely part of libertarianism, so that is check one. Ludicrous, because of it's inherent opposition to structure undermines the idea of a coherent framework of ideals in a society. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago https://www.anarchistfaq.org/afaq/sectionA.html https://www.anarchistfaq.org/afaq/sectionF.html permalink fedilink source parent [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child) Keep on showcasing how ignorant you are. Go read a book, child. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) I've read plenty of them, but please. Bring your own interpretation instead of being a little condescending brat. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child) Mhm, sure you have, bubba. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children) Indeed I have, but please keep embarrassing yourself by not even countering and just going to name calling. I suggest reading "Debt" by David Graeber to get a better understanding of the economic effect in social structures. There are plenty of examples of historical societies that have attempted and failed at anarchy. Most of them fail when the people that do the work society needs, get used by those that do not work, eventually leading to violence. That violence goes in opposition of the social agreement, although not necessarily, as there is nothing inherent about anarchism that would hinder violence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago David Graeber was an anarchist, it is in the second line of his Wikipedia. Also he talks about it in bullshit jobs a bit. You really are doing yourself no favors here, go read some books. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago* (1 child) I have read Debt, as well as Dawn of Everything plus Bullshit Jobs, also by the late prominent anarchist political activist and cultural anthropologist, David Graeber. The irony that you didn't understand that those books are in support of Anarchism. You clearly didn't understand anything about what you read. Keep embarrassing yourself. You're doing great at it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) From that book I understood that anarchism is not going to work. From the words of an anarchist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child) Then you understood nothing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago Or we have different perspectives. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children) Oh, do enlighten me what part of the statement is untrue and start from there. Instead of going to name calling. Anarchism is absolutely part of libertarianism, so that is check one. Ludicrous, because of it's inherent opposition to structure undermines the idea of a coherent framework of ideals in a society. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago https://www.anarchistfaq.org/afaq/sectionA.html https://www.anarchistfaq.org/afaq/sectionF.html permalink fedilink source parent [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child) Keep on showcasing how ignorant you are. Go read a book, child. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) I've read plenty of them, but please. Bring your own interpretation instead of being a little condescending brat. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child) Mhm, sure you have, bubba. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children) Indeed I have, but please keep embarrassing yourself by not even countering and just going to name calling. I suggest reading "Debt" by David Graeber to get a better understanding of the economic effect in social structures. There are plenty of examples of historical societies that have attempted and failed at anarchy. Most of them fail when the people that do the work society needs, get used by those that do not work, eventually leading to violence. That violence goes in opposition of the social agreement, although not necessarily, as there is nothing inherent about anarchism that would hinder violence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago David Graeber was an anarchist, it is in the second line of his Wikipedia. Also he talks about it in bullshit jobs a bit. You really are doing yourself no favors here, go read some books. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago* (1 child) I have read Debt, as well as Dawn of Everything plus Bullshit Jobs, also by the late prominent anarchist political activist and cultural anthropologist, David Graeber. The irony that you didn't understand that those books are in support of Anarchism. You clearly didn't understand anything about what you read. Keep embarrassing yourself. You're doing great at it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) From that book I understood that anarchism is not going to work. From the words of an anarchist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child) Then you understood nothing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago Or we have different perspectives. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago https://www.anarchistfaq.org/afaq/sectionA.html https://www.anarchistfaq.org/afaq/sectionF.html permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child) Keep on showcasing how ignorant you are. Go read a book, child. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) I've read plenty of them, but please. Bring your own interpretation instead of being a little condescending brat. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child) Mhm, sure you have, bubba. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children) Indeed I have, but please keep embarrassing yourself by not even countering and just going to name calling. I suggest reading "Debt" by David Graeber to get a better understanding of the economic effect in social structures. There are plenty of examples of historical societies that have attempted and failed at anarchy. Most of them fail when the people that do the work society needs, get used by those that do not work, eventually leading to violence. That violence goes in opposition of the social agreement, although not necessarily, as there is nothing inherent about anarchism that would hinder violence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago David Graeber was an anarchist, it is in the second line of his Wikipedia. Also he talks about it in bullshit jobs a bit. You really are doing yourself no favors here, go read some books. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago* (1 child) I have read Debt, as well as Dawn of Everything plus Bullshit Jobs, also by the late prominent anarchist political activist and cultural anthropologist, David Graeber. The irony that you didn't understand that those books are in support of Anarchism. You clearly didn't understand anything about what you read. Keep embarrassing yourself. You're doing great at it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) From that book I understood that anarchism is not going to work. From the words of an anarchist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child) Then you understood nothing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago Or we have different perspectives. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) I've read plenty of them, but please. Bring your own interpretation instead of being a little condescending brat. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child) Mhm, sure you have, bubba. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children) Indeed I have, but please keep embarrassing yourself by not even countering and just going to name calling. I suggest reading "Debt" by David Graeber to get a better understanding of the economic effect in social structures. There are plenty of examples of historical societies that have attempted and failed at anarchy. Most of them fail when the people that do the work society needs, get used by those that do not work, eventually leading to violence. That violence goes in opposition of the social agreement, although not necessarily, as there is nothing inherent about anarchism that would hinder violence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago David Graeber was an anarchist, it is in the second line of his Wikipedia. Also he talks about it in bullshit jobs a bit. You really are doing yourself no favors here, go read some books. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago* (1 child) I have read Debt, as well as Dawn of Everything plus Bullshit Jobs, also by the late prominent anarchist political activist and cultural anthropologist, David Graeber. The irony that you didn't understand that those books are in support of Anarchism. You clearly didn't understand anything about what you read. Keep embarrassing yourself. You're doing great at it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) From that book I understood that anarchism is not going to work. From the words of an anarchist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child) Then you understood nothing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago Or we have different perspectives. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child) Mhm, sure you have, bubba. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children) Indeed I have, but please keep embarrassing yourself by not even countering and just going to name calling. I suggest reading "Debt" by David Graeber to get a better understanding of the economic effect in social structures. There are plenty of examples of historical societies that have attempted and failed at anarchy. Most of them fail when the people that do the work society needs, get used by those that do not work, eventually leading to violence. That violence goes in opposition of the social agreement, although not necessarily, as there is nothing inherent about anarchism that would hinder violence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago David Graeber was an anarchist, it is in the second line of his Wikipedia. Also he talks about it in bullshit jobs a bit. You really are doing yourself no favors here, go read some books. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago* (1 child) I have read Debt, as well as Dawn of Everything plus Bullshit Jobs, also by the late prominent anarchist political activist and cultural anthropologist, David Graeber. The irony that you didn't understand that those books are in support of Anarchism. You clearly didn't understand anything about what you read. Keep embarrassing yourself. You're doing great at it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) From that book I understood that anarchism is not going to work. From the words of an anarchist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child) Then you understood nothing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago Or we have different perspectives. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children) Indeed I have, but please keep embarrassing yourself by not even countering and just going to name calling. I suggest reading "Debt" by David Graeber to get a better understanding of the economic effect in social structures. There are plenty of examples of historical societies that have attempted and failed at anarchy. Most of them fail when the people that do the work society needs, get used by those that do not work, eventually leading to violence. That violence goes in opposition of the social agreement, although not necessarily, as there is nothing inherent about anarchism that would hinder violence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago David Graeber was an anarchist, it is in the second line of his Wikipedia. Also he talks about it in bullshit jobs a bit. You really are doing yourself no favors here, go read some books. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago* (1 child) I have read Debt, as well as Dawn of Everything plus Bullshit Jobs, also by the late prominent anarchist political activist and cultural anthropologist, David Graeber. The irony that you didn't understand that those books are in support of Anarchism. You clearly didn't understand anything about what you read. Keep embarrassing yourself. You're doing great at it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) From that book I understood that anarchism is not going to work. From the words of an anarchist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child) Then you understood nothing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago Or we have different perspectives. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago David Graeber was an anarchist, it is in the second line of his Wikipedia. Also he talks about it in bullshit jobs a bit. You really are doing yourself no favors here, go read some books. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago* (1 child) I have read Debt, as well as Dawn of Everything plus Bullshit Jobs, also by the late prominent anarchist political activist and cultural anthropologist, David Graeber. The irony that you didn't understand that those books are in support of Anarchism. You clearly didn't understand anything about what you read. Keep embarrassing yourself. You're doing great at it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) From that book I understood that anarchism is not going to work. From the words of an anarchist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child) Then you understood nothing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago Or we have different perspectives. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) From that book I understood that anarchism is not going to work. From the words of an anarchist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child) Then you understood nothing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago Or we have different perspectives. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child) Then you understood nothing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago Or we have different perspectives. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago Or we have different perspectives. permalink fedilink source parent