▲ 285 ▼ It really is the worst image format (lemmy.world) submitted 1 week ago by cannedtuna@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.world 83 comments fedilink hide all child comments Copy image? Nope, here’s the link instead.
[–] diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 week ago (1 child) Translation: your video editor sucks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FreeAZ@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children) Have you ever edited a video or are you just talking out your ass? Really doesn't matter, he said they had the same functionality, they do not. It had no problem at all with other image formats. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] olafurp@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago To be fair, if your video editor doesn't support webp in 2026 it has to at least suck a little bit. permalink fedilink source parent [–] diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago* Yes, a few times. I have exactly 60 ".kdenlive" files in my "videos" dir. That editor itself sucks, but seems your does harder. Can't demo much as most of these are aimed at very niche communities (ranging from 1k people to 4 person groupchat with only 1 person who cares), and some are also a bit problematic in content. As you could have guessed, it's meme stuff, so quite image heavy. some examples that I am comfortable with sharing (low res link for last one) license (please note that they are basically collages of de minimis and transformative content, sometimes needed for parody) DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE Version 2, December 2004 Copyright (C) 2004 Sam Hocevar <sam@hocevar.net> Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim or modified copies of this license document, and changing it is allowed as long as the name is changed. DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION 0. You just DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO. Now, what are you defining as "functionality"? permalink fedilink source parent [–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago Speaking of talking out your ass, you seem unable to differentiate between the responsibility of a file format, and the responsibility of the file reader. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FreeAZ@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children) Have you ever edited a video or are you just talking out your ass? Really doesn't matter, he said they had the same functionality, they do not. It had no problem at all with other image formats. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] olafurp@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago To be fair, if your video editor doesn't support webp in 2026 it has to at least suck a little bit. permalink fedilink source parent [–] diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago* Yes, a few times. I have exactly 60 ".kdenlive" files in my "videos" dir. That editor itself sucks, but seems your does harder. Can't demo much as most of these are aimed at very niche communities (ranging from 1k people to 4 person groupchat with only 1 person who cares), and some are also a bit problematic in content. As you could have guessed, it's meme stuff, so quite image heavy. some examples that I am comfortable with sharing (low res link for last one) license (please note that they are basically collages of de minimis and transformative content, sometimes needed for parody) DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE Version 2, December 2004 Copyright (C) 2004 Sam Hocevar <sam@hocevar.net> Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim or modified copies of this license document, and changing it is allowed as long as the name is changed. DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION 0. You just DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO. Now, what are you defining as "functionality"? permalink fedilink source parent [–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago Speaking of talking out your ass, you seem unable to differentiate between the responsibility of a file format, and the responsibility of the file reader. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago To be fair, if your video editor doesn't support webp in 2026 it has to at least suck a little bit. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago* Yes, a few times. I have exactly 60 ".kdenlive" files in my "videos" dir. That editor itself sucks, but seems your does harder. Can't demo much as most of these are aimed at very niche communities (ranging from 1k people to 4 person groupchat with only 1 person who cares), and some are also a bit problematic in content. As you could have guessed, it's meme stuff, so quite image heavy. some examples that I am comfortable with sharing (low res link for last one) license (please note that they are basically collages of de minimis and transformative content, sometimes needed for parody) DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE Version 2, December 2004 Copyright (C) 2004 Sam Hocevar <sam@hocevar.net> Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim or modified copies of this license document, and changing it is allowed as long as the name is changed. DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION 0. You just DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO. Now, what are you defining as "functionality"? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago Speaking of talking out your ass, you seem unable to differentiate between the responsibility of a file format, and the responsibility of the file reader. permalink fedilink source parent
