Abstract page for arXiv paper 2604.03136: StoryScope: Investigating idiosyncrasies in AI fiction

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] [S] -26 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

only 7% of human work got flagged for ai it is reliable though

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 2 weeks ago* (1 child)

    Percentages are somewhat misleading here. That's around 2 in 25, enough to falsely accuse a student or 2 in a fairly standard classroom for example.

    I remember somebody mentioning a quote along the lines of "A 95% success rate sounds good, until you become the 1 in 20 that it kills"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 2 weeks ago* (1 child)

    In matters of life and death, the alternative choices are always important to consider...

    5% chance of dying vs a 99% chance of living a horrible life of immobility and pain?

    We all die eventually.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Getting your degree or being kicked out and banned from your college and still requires to pay back the loans. IS life or death.

    It literally can determine the quality of life of a person for the next 30-40 years. If not forever. This is NOT something to take lightly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    I lived that perspective roughly from high school through sophomore year in University... after sophomore year I took a different view: "I am good enough, regardless of what arbitrary ratings these sad little men put on my transcripts."

    My reality is: I got a teaching assistantship - the D I received in Calc II didn't weigh on that decision one iota - in contradiction of the admonishments of several "advisors" I was required to see while selecting course schedules for the coming semesters; then, I got a good job out of school and nobody ever read my transcripts to see that I had a 3.45 GPA undergrad and a 3.75 GPA in grad school. Nobody outside my review committee ever looked at my Masters' Thesis, and I think one of them never really read the whole thing.

    Once I "let go" about grades and ratings and all that bullshit, I got another C in Statistics I from a sad little man whose "son hates him too, like me." Any amount of stressing about that grade and my performance in the class would not have changed the outcome - we were an Honors class of 3.3 GPAs and up, many 3.9s and up in there, and he gave all but one of us C or lower. Elsewhere - and overall - I believe I performed better academically due to not stressing about it.

    The parking gestapo started patrolling a week earlier than their announced end of "free parking for summer" period and wrote me a ticket, I appealed, they denied, I decided to see where this led without me paying. For a $20 fine, they sent me about 100 collection letters (postage far higher than $0.20 on each one) over the following years, and told me that "my transcripts are FROZEN and will not be released to anyone until the fine is paid." Welp, here we are, 40ish years later, and nobody has denied me employment or promotion or any other thing because they can't get a copy of my transcripts. One new employer 12 years after graduation asked me for a copy "to have on file" and I gave them an earlier copy I had pulled before the parking ticket, didn't show degree conferred, they didn't care - gave me Masters' degree pay rate anyway. Nobody else, anywhere at any of the dozen employers I have had in the last 40 years, ever asked me for transcripts or other proof of my education.

    By the time you've had something impact your quality of life for 10 years, that is an impact to your entire quality of life. If the University actually expells you over an AI infraction, my take is that they probably wanted to expell you for other reasons already, and your academic career at that institution would have been an unpleasant uphill battle even without the AI flap.

    One other thing I learned during my Teaching Assistantship: a couple of my students were demonstrating absolutely zero understanding of the material being taught and making zero effort to improve their understanding, resisting my offers to help. I gave them a failing grade. My advisor was called to the Dean's office, when he returned he sat me down for a lesson: "These are paying customers, if they show up to class they get at least a C." I suspect that is true of almost every private university in the world.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Holy the ignorant self-centered anecdote. Too long, no relevance, do not recommend. I‘d probably give it a failing grade.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    I‘d probably give it a failing grade.

    And after age 19 or so, I wouldn't care.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Traits of the ignorant, as one would expect.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Your failing grade has no negative impact on my life... caring would be the ignorant response.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    ignorant self-centered anecdote. Too long, no relevance

    That‘s the actual critique. But of course you‘d focus on the grade given.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    You remind me of little doodles I would do on my physics assignments back then, irrelevant comets in the orbital calculations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    And now you‘re trying to impress the empty ether with your irrelevant doodles from back when.

    Just like you keep dwelling on your own trivial creations, you keep lingering in conversations you should’ve put behind you eons ago.

    My humble guess is: the massive gravitational center of any orbit you’ve ever calculated has always been your ego.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    I didn't realize my 'trivial creations' required a full thesis review from you.

    Who keeps lingering in conversations they should’ve put behind themselves eons ago?

    If my ego has a gravitational pull, I suggest you stop orbiting it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Calling a one-liner a thesis after trying to make an argument with long-winded, but ultimately empty autobiographical babble — like an ugly accident one cannot look away from, this just keeps pulling me in.

    So, how does the anecdotal, badly written life story of a self-absorbed ego going through a midlife crisis relate to the reality of people getting their lives fucked through some automated allegation machine? Would you, maybe, condense your point into a simple sentence? So that even irrelevant comets are able to get it and to also showcase your moral blindness towards systemic dangers, just because you managed to get through, back in the good ol’ days. Dangers that, as pointed out already and contrary to you own experience, will have life changing consequences for other people. That’d be great.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 weeks ago* (1 child)

    the reality of people getting their lives fucked through some automated allegation machine?

    The reality is: you are fucked with or without the stamp of approval from academia. Get over the ratings game, nobody cares if you got an A+ in Algebra III or a higher than 3.75 GPA. They (that would hire you) usually don't care about what school you went to except to make football conversation. If one boots you, there are 4000 more out there just as willing to give you another chance.

    Big talk about academic integity has been exactly that for 50+ years: big talk, very little action in reality. If you're a one in a million victim of terrible application of technology - you've got a good chance of winning a fat discrimination lawsuit, if that's how you want to live your life.

    Would you, maybe, condense your point

    No, but I'll give you a couple of links to read: let me know what you think AFTER you've gotten at least 1/2 way through: https://rmst202.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2022/04/illich_deschooling-society.pdf https://arl.human.cornell.edu/linked%20docs/Illich_Tools_for_Conviviality.pdf

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Thankfully, I am not your pupil. If you're not able to make an argument without sending people off to read into your own philosophies, you ultimately failed to make an argument.

    You're' making a categorical error, as this thread is about an Automaton having direct, tangible real-world consequences for people's live trajectory. It's not about the legitimacy of the educational system itself, not about the relevance of grades. If it was, I would probably even agree with you.

    Now, that your initial, ideological take has been rebuked after the very first try, you keep arguing a strawman from a privileged position of survivorship bias, with an outdated anecdote and an absolute refusal to acknowledge differential vulnerability, by reducing your pompous deliberations about systemic rot into individual failure. Effectively a cruel form of victim-blaming disguised as enlightenment. And probably one of the most US-American things to do.

    But what is it now, the failure of the system or of the individual? Because your argument seems to be condemning the system as irredeemably corrupt, yet simultaneously you blame individuals for not transcending it. If the system is so rotten, how can individual failure to escape it be a moral failing? Of course you can't escape that contradiction without exposing your very own misanthropic disgust for those that didn't manage.

    You, the irrelevant comet in my orbit, only drift further off into the void now, by distorting the problem of a 7% false-positive rate on a life-altering accusation into a one in a million (0.0001%) chance of terrible application of technology. Mixed with unfounded empirical claims about the material conditions about the labor market in the 21 century and spiteful jabs at potential live choices of the ones falling through the cracks.

    Your attempts to claim authority are merely furthering your illegitimacy as a serious person. You're dismissed. Off you go, lil' irrelevant comet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    It’s not about the legitimacy of the educational system itself

    Isn't it? If a bunch of loan sharks are suddenly impeding their borrowers ability to pay because their borrowers have used AI, is AI the problem? As a society, the British empire and colonies transcended debtors prisons some centuries ago, as counterproductive as public hangings of pickpockets.

    rebuked after the very first try

    In your head.

    victim-blaming

    The victims aren't being victimized by the University's use of (insert new thing here), they've been victimized for decades by overpriced education coupled with a limp job market.

    system as irredeemably corrupt

    Is it not?

    the system is so rotten, how can individual failure to escape it be a moral failing?

    The individuals are flocking to the rotten system which gives little benfit to most, negative benefits to many, and now it's threatening to throw them out for embracing a future that the rotten system can't keep up with. This isn't victim blaming, it's redirecting gasoline soaked refugees away from a burning building advertising itself as a safe shelter.

    a 7% false-positive rate on a life-altering accusation

    Show me the university that's taking these false life-altering actions - where's the list of expelled students? That's going to turn into a list of fat lawsuits and payouts if it exists, which it doesn't, because the Universities would never expel their golden geese. This is hot-air threats just as every "academic integrity" bluster of the past 50 years has been.

    Your attempts to claim authority

    I'm no authority, I'm a single column of text on the internet, yet you react as if you are threatened...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Okay so what I'm taking away from this is that you were lucky to find gainful employment without proof of a degree and didn't have any debt to pay off? Because the context here is people having all the debt and none of the credentials required for jobs where they make enough to pay off that debt. If your card is declined, how you feel about it doesn't matter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    I had student loans, luckily they only amounted to 4-5 months' gross income - lucky because scholarships stepped up and I only had to take a loan for one year instead of all six.

    none of the credentials required for jobs

    I got news for you: you can have all the credentials in the world available from the best Universities, and when a place isn't hiring, they aren't hiring. I've gone job hunting in Melbourne Florida after Columbia burnt up on re-entry, the entire town wasn't hiring - that's not about me, they weren't hiring anyone.

    I interviewed in Manhattan with a fresh Honors degree from a good school, the employment agents there dumped all over me about how worthless I was, until... I wandered into an office where the interviewer had a glass table, she looked down through it and saw my shoes were freshly shined, my silk tie was bright red ($2 from a street vendor), and I had a goofy-trendy $50 haircut that was in-style, she gushed: "oh, I know exactly who will hire you: Kidder Peabody, you'll so fit right in." She barely glanced at my resume' "you do computer stuff, right? Yeah, they're always looking for more computer guys, they're just gonna love you!" Transcripts were never mentioned.

    After .com hit, any remotely computer related degree, straight out of school was a ticket to more than double what I made starting out with the best computer degree for .com, those kids left school making more than my boss with 25 years experience was making 5 years' earlier.

    Market gets saturated, hiring stops again. It's different in different fields, but still much the same: cycles. Personal referrals beat the HR screening circus. The place I work today, I had applied to 4 times in the previous 15 years, HR never even called me back. Personal referral got me a work from home spot at a company this company ended up buying, since they bought me I bypassed the HR filters. Once I was past the HR filters they offered my an 8 month salary signing bonus to stay with them at least 1 year, my base pay has increased faster than inflation for 12 years straight now, and the annual bonus runs about 2 months salary.

    I'm not revealing any useful "secrets" here... truth is: the system sucks, when it's not blowing chunks. But, that's the world - and trust me when I tell you: academics A) don't know everything about how the rest of the world works, and B) what they do know they tend to distort for their students in various ways, for various reasons.

    Any rant against academia this long deserves this link: https://rmst202.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2022/04/illich_deschooling-society.pdf

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    I had student loans, luckily they only amounted to 4-5 months' gross income - lucky because scholarships stepped up and I only had to take a loan for one year instead of all six.

    Still more than you should have had (education shouldn't put you in debt imo), but definitely far less than other people have. Particularly people studying in the last few years. .com is long gone, prices have gone up and the margin between net income and cost of living is slim for many people.

    That's my whole point: you shouldn't downplay the impact that being thrown out can have if you've got $50k in student loan debt. If you cheated, sure, that's on you. But if you were falsely accused by a detector that turns up false positives for one or two students per class, on average, that just sucks like an open window in space.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    the impact that being thrown out can have if you’ve got $50k in student loan debt.

    In today's world, that puts you in good company of other student loan sufferers who aren't actually deadbeats, but instead victims of an economic pincer movement between rising tuition costs and falling employment opportunities.

    During the 4 years I was in undergraduate, my University doubled tuition, the last year literally cost twice as much as the first one. They "managed" the situation by giving lots of scholarships which made the impact negligible to current students, but those quickly faded away. We as the student body literally marched and protested against it - this was the very beginning of the US federally backed student loan program and universities all over the country were ramping up tuition levels to take advantage of the "extra funding" that was becoming available to new high school graduates through that program. It was an obvious blatant cash grab putting our generation in debt for the very same education that our predecessors got for less than half the cost. Various "peace dividends" of the collapse of the USSR masked the problem until the collapse of .com as you note.

    War Games with Matthew Broderick summed it up: the only way to win is not to play. https://rmst202.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2022/04/illich_deschooling-society.pdf

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    That's not good enough. Just a thought experiment: Only 7% of humans died because their work got flagged incorrectly

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] [S] -33 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    this is just spherical cow fallacy combined with purity culture slop

    no methodology is perfect, it just needs to be practically valid, using ai != killing people for using ai

    unless you are for killing people who use AI, which wouldn't surprise me one bit about Anti-AI horde

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Tell that to the student who gets expelled because they're writing was falsely identified as AI and then takes their own life.

    Tell that to the person falsely identified with facial recognition and is arrested and loses their job.

    Using AI to detect AI is as bad as using AI for any important decision.

    This isn't hypothetical. It happens. People will lose their livelihood or die because of it. 7 in 100 is not accurate enough when any penalty is applied to detection.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Back when I was in Uni poor grades were considered a lifelong sentence to poverty...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    To be fair it still is. It's even worse if your expelled and have to pay back the loan any ways.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments