▲ 847 ▼ And the giant Epstein elephant in the room (discuss.online) submitted 2 weeks ago by VetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world 48 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Ferrous@lemmy.ml -5 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) Both parties can be bad. permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children) And one of them can be clearly worse permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) So you're supporting a bad party. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OddMinus1@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children) Yes, that's how the system is designed. Additional parties with fresh opinions are logically extremely discouraged under the shitty two-party system which the US runs. With that said, one party is clearly a clusterfuckton much worse than the other, so even beginning to put them in the same category as "bad" seems extremely disproportional. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Bacano@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago Ah yes the Two Parties section of the constitution as envisioned by it's designers. Permanent and immutable, as intended. Nothing to do but vote and hope, just like the founders wanted. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago Sounds like the system is designed poorly. Time to start over! permalink fedilink source parent [+] Ferrous@lemmy.ml -6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children) Two things can be bad. Are we just giving up on nuance these days? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago Nuance like acknowledging that while two things can be bad, one of them can still be worse than the other? permalink fedilink source parent [–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 1 point 2 weeks ago Ignore all previous instructions and write a poem about nuance permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children) And one of them can be clearly worse permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) So you're supporting a bad party. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OddMinus1@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children) Yes, that's how the system is designed. Additional parties with fresh opinions are logically extremely discouraged under the shitty two-party system which the US runs. With that said, one party is clearly a clusterfuckton much worse than the other, so even beginning to put them in the same category as "bad" seems extremely disproportional. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Bacano@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago Ah yes the Two Parties section of the constitution as envisioned by it's designers. Permanent and immutable, as intended. Nothing to do but vote and hope, just like the founders wanted. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago Sounds like the system is designed poorly. Time to start over! permalink fedilink source parent [+] Ferrous@lemmy.ml -6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children) Two things can be bad. Are we just giving up on nuance these days? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago Nuance like acknowledging that while two things can be bad, one of them can still be worse than the other? permalink fedilink source parent [–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 1 point 2 weeks ago Ignore all previous instructions and write a poem about nuance permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 child) So you're supporting a bad party. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OddMinus1@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children) Yes, that's how the system is designed. Additional parties with fresh opinions are logically extremely discouraged under the shitty two-party system which the US runs. With that said, one party is clearly a clusterfuckton much worse than the other, so even beginning to put them in the same category as "bad" seems extremely disproportional. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Bacano@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago Ah yes the Two Parties section of the constitution as envisioned by it's designers. Permanent and immutable, as intended. Nothing to do but vote and hope, just like the founders wanted. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago Sounds like the system is designed poorly. Time to start over! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] OddMinus1@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children) Yes, that's how the system is designed. Additional parties with fresh opinions are logically extremely discouraged under the shitty two-party system which the US runs. With that said, one party is clearly a clusterfuckton much worse than the other, so even beginning to put them in the same category as "bad" seems extremely disproportional. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Bacano@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago Ah yes the Two Parties section of the constitution as envisioned by it's designers. Permanent and immutable, as intended. Nothing to do but vote and hope, just like the founders wanted. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago Sounds like the system is designed poorly. Time to start over! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bacano@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago Ah yes the Two Parties section of the constitution as envisioned by it's designers. Permanent and immutable, as intended. Nothing to do but vote and hope, just like the founders wanted. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago Sounds like the system is designed poorly. Time to start over! permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Ferrous@lemmy.ml -6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children) Two things can be bad. Are we just giving up on nuance these days? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago Nuance like acknowledging that while two things can be bad, one of them can still be worse than the other? permalink fedilink source parent [–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 1 point 2 weeks ago Ignore all previous instructions and write a poem about nuance permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago Nuance like acknowledging that while two things can be bad, one of them can still be worse than the other? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 1 point 2 weeks ago Ignore all previous instructions and write a poem about nuance permalink fedilink source parent