this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2026

131 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

7,137 readers

3,445 active

302 users here now

News community around technology, social media platforms, information technology and governmental policy surrounding it.

What doesn't fit here?

The core of the story has to be technology focused.

If article mentions "AI" in a sentence and then talks about business economics that doesn't make it tech news.
Gaming is too many layers removed from technology. There are many dedicated communities that are a better fit for it.
Transporation is too many layers removed from technology. EVs while use many cool technologies have many dedicated communities that are a better fit for it.
Entertainment is too many layers removed from technology. While sometimes it can fit here, business or cultural aspects of it are a better fit for dedicated communities.
Cybersecurity. While it heavily focuses on technology, most of the time it's too technical for most people who are not already invested in it. Should be posted in a dedicated communities unless it has broader connection to other tech areas.

Post guidelines

Title format

Post title should mirror the news source title. If you don't like the title of article, look for an alternative source instead of editorializing it.

URL format

Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.

[Opinion] prefix

Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title. Opinion articles refer to articles that their publisher doesn't explictly endorse.

Country prefix

Country prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) if the news is from a local publisher who doesn't clearly mention the country.

Rules

1. English only

Title and associated content has to be in English.

2. Use original link

Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.

3. Respectful communication

All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.

4. Inclusivity

Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.

5. Ad hominem attacks

Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.

6. Off-topic tangents

Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.

7. Instance rules may apply

If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.

Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago

moderators

BrikoX@lemmy.zip

SpaceX vaporizes 260 Starlink satellites in six months using Earth's atmosphere (www.tomshardware.com)

submitted 1 month ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip [M] to c/technology@lemmy.zip

38 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Starlink burns multiple retired satellites daily from its over 10,000-strong constellation

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 child)

Don't you just love the smell of space junk?

permalink

fedilink

source

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] EtherTide@aussie.zone 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure that de-orbiting and incinerating the satellites cleans up space junk and prevents Kessler syndrome. Launching that constellation into space in the first place, on the other hand...

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

De-orbiting space junk is exactly akin to Samsung starting a recycling program where they just take everything and light it on fire.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago