▲ 31 ▼ Rust Coreutils cp Ended Up Breaking Ubuntu Image Builds With Latest Incompatibility (www.phoronix.com) submitted 1 month ago by cm0002@lemdro.id to c/linux@programming.dev 15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] lengau@midwest.social 3 points 1 month ago (1 child) Oh then it must be because of the MIT license! /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Papierkorb@feddit.org 9 points 1 month ago (3 children) That's my biggest pet peeve with it honestly. My theory is still that it's a mistake that modern languages/tooling create a LICENSE file for you. In the before-times, when someone posted a project without then you told them and they educated themselves. Some chose GPL, some MIT, all fine, as long you do it with an educated mind. But now, the file gets created, technically legally binding contract of sorts, and the authors simply never bothered to check. Change my mind: Linux is only still highly relevant because of GPL, not despite of. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] eutampieri@feddit.it 3 points 1 month ago Cargo doesn’t create a LICENCE for you, and it doesn’t set the metadata like npm. It even tells you to go choose a license when you try to publish a crate without one permalink fedilink source parent [–] ZombieCyborgFromOuterSpace@piefed.ca 1 point 1 month ago I agree with you on that one. permalink fedilink source parent [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 1 point 1 month ago The term "cuck license" for MIT and similar licenses is a good one IMO. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Papierkorb@feddit.org 9 points 1 month ago (3 children) That's my biggest pet peeve with it honestly. My theory is still that it's a mistake that modern languages/tooling create a LICENSE file for you. In the before-times, when someone posted a project without then you told them and they educated themselves. Some chose GPL, some MIT, all fine, as long you do it with an educated mind. But now, the file gets created, technically legally binding contract of sorts, and the authors simply never bothered to check. Change my mind: Linux is only still highly relevant because of GPL, not despite of. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] eutampieri@feddit.it 3 points 1 month ago Cargo doesn’t create a LICENCE for you, and it doesn’t set the metadata like npm. It even tells you to go choose a license when you try to publish a crate without one permalink fedilink source parent [–] ZombieCyborgFromOuterSpace@piefed.ca 1 point 1 month ago I agree with you on that one. permalink fedilink source parent [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 1 point 1 month ago The term "cuck license" for MIT and similar licenses is a good one IMO. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] eutampieri@feddit.it 3 points 1 month ago Cargo doesn’t create a LICENCE for you, and it doesn’t set the metadata like npm. It even tells you to go choose a license when you try to publish a crate without one permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ZombieCyborgFromOuterSpace@piefed.ca 1 point 1 month ago I agree with you on that one. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 1 point 1 month ago The term "cuck license" for MIT and similar licenses is a good one IMO. permalink fedilink source parent