Technology

technology@lemmy.world

86,856 readers

15,379 active

3,384 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago

moderators

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

Cleveland Voted to Kill Its Flock Camera Network. They Have REMAINED ON, With Police Still Using Them (www.gadgetreview.com)

submitted 1 month ago by sanitation@lemmy.today to c/technology@lemmy.world

201 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

So there is a country with more guns than inhabitants, and they are afraid of a f-ing laser?

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] iLStrix@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

I would argue strong lasers are more dangerous than guns on average.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Depends on the definition of "strong".

If you mean "a laser that melts down the Flock camera into a steaming puddle", then I'd agree. But if you mean "a laser that kills a CCD chip", then no.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

lemmy:	0.19.20
mlmym (mschae):	26.3.4