▲ 712 ▼ Awful practice and great job California! (discuss.online) submitted 1 month ago* by VetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to c/upliftingnews@lemmy.world 110 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago* (3 children) That was for tv and also maybe radio? Technically, this is different. Also, I don’t know of any parodies of tv broadcasts with malicious audio ads. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago Also, I don’t know of any parodies of tv broadcasts with malicious audio ads. That's because no one watches broadcast tv anymore. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 child) This is literally the same thing. Some small technical details regarding the delivery method are wholly immaterial, and any arguments asserting that it is are fully disingenuous. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago we’re literally in the comments of an article indicating that this is legally distinct deafening, and I’m pretty obviously joking about the distinction being time alone permalink fedilink source parent [–] errer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) I remember them passing such laws and yet commercials on broadcast TV remain loud as fuck permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago The workaround was that since commercials couldn't be louder than the loudest part of the show airing, they made the show theme songs super fucking loud. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago Also, I don’t know of any parodies of tv broadcasts with malicious audio ads. That's because no one watches broadcast tv anymore. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 child) This is literally the same thing. Some small technical details regarding the delivery method are wholly immaterial, and any arguments asserting that it is are fully disingenuous. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago we’re literally in the comments of an article indicating that this is legally distinct deafening, and I’m pretty obviously joking about the distinction being time alone permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago we’re literally in the comments of an article indicating that this is legally distinct deafening, and I’m pretty obviously joking about the distinction being time alone permalink fedilink source parent
[–] errer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) I remember them passing such laws and yet commercials on broadcast TV remain loud as fuck permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago The workaround was that since commercials couldn't be louder than the loudest part of the show airing, they made the show theme songs super fucking loud. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago The workaround was that since commercials couldn't be louder than the loudest part of the show airing, they made the show theme songs super fucking loud. permalink fedilink source parent