▲ 436 ▼ me_irl (lemmy.today) submitted 3 weeks ago by sanitation@lemmy.today to c/me_irl@lemmy.world 24 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] eatCasserole@lemmy.world -12 points 3 weeks ago (3 children) Calorie counting is nonsense anyway. permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 weeks ago (2 children) How so? It's only an abstraction, but it's the simplest way to estimate how much you shoved in your face. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Sequence5666@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children) is there an open source app of calorie counting? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] nialv7@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago https://f-droid.org/en/packages/com.waist.line/ permalink fedilink source parent [–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago I imagine, but I don't know. Sorry. permalink fedilink source parent [+] eatCasserole@lemmy.world -8 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) It's not accurate enough to be useful. You know the difference between a snickers bar and a cucumber. One is very energy dense, one is not. Putting specific numbers on it adds no value when those numbers are just guesses. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) What makes you think they're just guesses? And if it isn't accurate enough to be useful, why does counting calories and running a caloric deficit help you lose weight? Personal experience says you're wrong on that one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) Personal experience is wildly unscientific. If attempting to count calories leads to eating less, and that leads to weight loss, bravo, you did a thing. But you could accomplish the same thing just by going to bed a little bit hungry most nights. Do you know how they figured out how much energy is in food? The burned it. Literally burned, with fire. You may be surprised to learn that's not what our bodies do. If you're eating processed food from a factory, the estimate of energy contained in the food (note, this is not what you'll absorb from the food) may be fairly accurate, but if you ever cook at home, then you're just adding a wild guess on top of an educated guess. You may as well just throw some darts at some numbers and save yourself some time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* If attempting to count calories leads to eating less, and that leads to weight loss, bravo, you did a thing. But you could accomplish the same thing just by going to bed a little bit hungry most nights. Counting calories to eat less likely means going to bed hungry. And that's easier to do if you're attempting to keep under a certain threshold. Which counting calories is a close enough approximation to get the job done. And your assertion that it's impossible to count calories when cooking at home is just ignorant at best. It's not that hard to put the approximate calorie count in for all the ingredients, and the total calorie count by the servings you made. I and multiple people I know, and many more I don't but have followed online) have used this kind of method to lose weight. No matter your opinion on the matter, counting calories is actually accurate enough to help you lose weight. it doesn't need to be a perfect tool to live in your toolbox. permalink fedilink source parent [–] protist@retrofed.com 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) While the type of food you eat matters tremendously to your overall health, the number of calories you eat vs expend daily absolutely matters also permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world -4 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) Sure it matters, but you don't know. You don't know how many calories you are actually absorbing from that food, and you don't know how long it takes to burn them off. Your metabolism can do all kinds of shenanigans, and unless the CO2 you're breathing out is being measured, you simply don't know what it's up to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] protist@retrofed.com 3 points 3 weeks ago* (1 child) The amount of food you eat matters dude. It's ok to track permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago Literally the first 3 words of the comment you're replying to: "sure it matters" permalink fedilink source parent [–] Tippy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 weeks ago ....in what way? If you consume more calories than your body burns to function, the excess is stored as mass. The opposite if you consume less, excess mass is burned. This is basic science, so if you've discovered some new major breakthrough in how human biology works I think we'd all be curious to hear it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 weeks ago (2 children) How so? It's only an abstraction, but it's the simplest way to estimate how much you shoved in your face. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Sequence5666@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children) is there an open source app of calorie counting? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] nialv7@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago https://f-droid.org/en/packages/com.waist.line/ permalink fedilink source parent [–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago I imagine, but I don't know. Sorry. permalink fedilink source parent [+] eatCasserole@lemmy.world -8 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) It's not accurate enough to be useful. You know the difference between a snickers bar and a cucumber. One is very energy dense, one is not. Putting specific numbers on it adds no value when those numbers are just guesses. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) What makes you think they're just guesses? And if it isn't accurate enough to be useful, why does counting calories and running a caloric deficit help you lose weight? Personal experience says you're wrong on that one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) Personal experience is wildly unscientific. If attempting to count calories leads to eating less, and that leads to weight loss, bravo, you did a thing. But you could accomplish the same thing just by going to bed a little bit hungry most nights. Do you know how they figured out how much energy is in food? The burned it. Literally burned, with fire. You may be surprised to learn that's not what our bodies do. If you're eating processed food from a factory, the estimate of energy contained in the food (note, this is not what you'll absorb from the food) may be fairly accurate, but if you ever cook at home, then you're just adding a wild guess on top of an educated guess. You may as well just throw some darts at some numbers and save yourself some time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* If attempting to count calories leads to eating less, and that leads to weight loss, bravo, you did a thing. But you could accomplish the same thing just by going to bed a little bit hungry most nights. Counting calories to eat less likely means going to bed hungry. And that's easier to do if you're attempting to keep under a certain threshold. Which counting calories is a close enough approximation to get the job done. And your assertion that it's impossible to count calories when cooking at home is just ignorant at best. It's not that hard to put the approximate calorie count in for all the ingredients, and the total calorie count by the servings you made. I and multiple people I know, and many more I don't but have followed online) have used this kind of method to lose weight. No matter your opinion on the matter, counting calories is actually accurate enough to help you lose weight. it doesn't need to be a perfect tool to live in your toolbox. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sequence5666@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children) is there an open source app of calorie counting? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] nialv7@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago https://f-droid.org/en/packages/com.waist.line/ permalink fedilink source parent [–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago I imagine, but I don't know. Sorry. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago https://f-droid.org/en/packages/com.waist.line/ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago I imagine, but I don't know. Sorry. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] eatCasserole@lemmy.world -8 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) It's not accurate enough to be useful. You know the difference between a snickers bar and a cucumber. One is very energy dense, one is not. Putting specific numbers on it adds no value when those numbers are just guesses. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) What makes you think they're just guesses? And if it isn't accurate enough to be useful, why does counting calories and running a caloric deficit help you lose weight? Personal experience says you're wrong on that one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) Personal experience is wildly unscientific. If attempting to count calories leads to eating less, and that leads to weight loss, bravo, you did a thing. But you could accomplish the same thing just by going to bed a little bit hungry most nights. Do you know how they figured out how much energy is in food? The burned it. Literally burned, with fire. You may be surprised to learn that's not what our bodies do. If you're eating processed food from a factory, the estimate of energy contained in the food (note, this is not what you'll absorb from the food) may be fairly accurate, but if you ever cook at home, then you're just adding a wild guess on top of an educated guess. You may as well just throw some darts at some numbers and save yourself some time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* If attempting to count calories leads to eating less, and that leads to weight loss, bravo, you did a thing. But you could accomplish the same thing just by going to bed a little bit hungry most nights. Counting calories to eat less likely means going to bed hungry. And that's easier to do if you're attempting to keep under a certain threshold. Which counting calories is a close enough approximation to get the job done. And your assertion that it's impossible to count calories when cooking at home is just ignorant at best. It's not that hard to put the approximate calorie count in for all the ingredients, and the total calorie count by the servings you made. I and multiple people I know, and many more I don't but have followed online) have used this kind of method to lose weight. No matter your opinion on the matter, counting calories is actually accurate enough to help you lose weight. it doesn't need to be a perfect tool to live in your toolbox. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) What makes you think they're just guesses? And if it isn't accurate enough to be useful, why does counting calories and running a caloric deficit help you lose weight? Personal experience says you're wrong on that one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) Personal experience is wildly unscientific. If attempting to count calories leads to eating less, and that leads to weight loss, bravo, you did a thing. But you could accomplish the same thing just by going to bed a little bit hungry most nights. Do you know how they figured out how much energy is in food? The burned it. Literally burned, with fire. You may be surprised to learn that's not what our bodies do. If you're eating processed food from a factory, the estimate of energy contained in the food (note, this is not what you'll absorb from the food) may be fairly accurate, but if you ever cook at home, then you're just adding a wild guess on top of an educated guess. You may as well just throw some darts at some numbers and save yourself some time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* If attempting to count calories leads to eating less, and that leads to weight loss, bravo, you did a thing. But you could accomplish the same thing just by going to bed a little bit hungry most nights. Counting calories to eat less likely means going to bed hungry. And that's easier to do if you're attempting to keep under a certain threshold. Which counting calories is a close enough approximation to get the job done. And your assertion that it's impossible to count calories when cooking at home is just ignorant at best. It's not that hard to put the approximate calorie count in for all the ingredients, and the total calorie count by the servings you made. I and multiple people I know, and many more I don't but have followed online) have used this kind of method to lose weight. No matter your opinion on the matter, counting calories is actually accurate enough to help you lose weight. it doesn't need to be a perfect tool to live in your toolbox. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) Personal experience is wildly unscientific. If attempting to count calories leads to eating less, and that leads to weight loss, bravo, you did a thing. But you could accomplish the same thing just by going to bed a little bit hungry most nights. Do you know how they figured out how much energy is in food? The burned it. Literally burned, with fire. You may be surprised to learn that's not what our bodies do. If you're eating processed food from a factory, the estimate of energy contained in the food (note, this is not what you'll absorb from the food) may be fairly accurate, but if you ever cook at home, then you're just adding a wild guess on top of an educated guess. You may as well just throw some darts at some numbers and save yourself some time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* If attempting to count calories leads to eating less, and that leads to weight loss, bravo, you did a thing. But you could accomplish the same thing just by going to bed a little bit hungry most nights. Counting calories to eat less likely means going to bed hungry. And that's easier to do if you're attempting to keep under a certain threshold. Which counting calories is a close enough approximation to get the job done. And your assertion that it's impossible to count calories when cooking at home is just ignorant at best. It's not that hard to put the approximate calorie count in for all the ingredients, and the total calorie count by the servings you made. I and multiple people I know, and many more I don't but have followed online) have used this kind of method to lose weight. No matter your opinion on the matter, counting calories is actually accurate enough to help you lose weight. it doesn't need to be a perfect tool to live in your toolbox. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* If attempting to count calories leads to eating less, and that leads to weight loss, bravo, you did a thing. But you could accomplish the same thing just by going to bed a little bit hungry most nights. Counting calories to eat less likely means going to bed hungry. And that's easier to do if you're attempting to keep under a certain threshold. Which counting calories is a close enough approximation to get the job done. And your assertion that it's impossible to count calories when cooking at home is just ignorant at best. It's not that hard to put the approximate calorie count in for all the ingredients, and the total calorie count by the servings you made. I and multiple people I know, and many more I don't but have followed online) have used this kind of method to lose weight. No matter your opinion on the matter, counting calories is actually accurate enough to help you lose weight. it doesn't need to be a perfect tool to live in your toolbox. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] protist@retrofed.com 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) While the type of food you eat matters tremendously to your overall health, the number of calories you eat vs expend daily absolutely matters also permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world -4 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) Sure it matters, but you don't know. You don't know how many calories you are actually absorbing from that food, and you don't know how long it takes to burn them off. Your metabolism can do all kinds of shenanigans, and unless the CO2 you're breathing out is being measured, you simply don't know what it's up to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] protist@retrofed.com 3 points 3 weeks ago* (1 child) The amount of food you eat matters dude. It's ok to track permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago Literally the first 3 words of the comment you're replying to: "sure it matters" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world -4 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) Sure it matters, but you don't know. You don't know how many calories you are actually absorbing from that food, and you don't know how long it takes to burn them off. Your metabolism can do all kinds of shenanigans, and unless the CO2 you're breathing out is being measured, you simply don't know what it's up to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] protist@retrofed.com 3 points 3 weeks ago* (1 child) The amount of food you eat matters dude. It's ok to track permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago Literally the first 3 words of the comment you're replying to: "sure it matters" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] protist@retrofed.com 3 points 3 weeks ago* (1 child) The amount of food you eat matters dude. It's ok to track permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago Literally the first 3 words of the comment you're replying to: "sure it matters" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago Literally the first 3 words of the comment you're replying to: "sure it matters" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Tippy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 weeks ago ....in what way? If you consume more calories than your body burns to function, the excess is stored as mass. The opposite if you consume less, excess mass is burned. This is basic science, so if you've discovered some new major breakthrough in how human biology works I think we'd all be curious to hear it. permalink fedilink source parent
