▲ 218 ▼ Supreme Court strikes down Hawaii law requiring gun owners to get explicit consent before carrying a gun onto restaurants and stores (www.jurist.org) submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Wudi@feddit.uk to c/news@lemmy.world 84 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] joeljoelle@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 month ago (1 child) Because most people understand not everything should be allowed everywhere. That's precisely my argument. I don't think people need to be carrying them at all permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 1 month ago* (1 child) 'This shouldn't be allowed everywhere' and 'This should be allowed nowhere' are not the same arguement though, I don't see how my quote fits your argument at all tbh. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] joeljoelle@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) Why are guns only allowed places where they are not, yet they champion their rights every where else. They can't have it both ways. Either we are responsible people with the rights to carry guns places, or we shouldn't have them. I don't know why there is this grey zone, that is conveniently where they happen to be at all times, yet we are the ones constantly put in danger due to the lax gun laws and regulations permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com -7 points 1 month ago* Either we are responsible people with the rights to carry guns places, or we shouldn't have them. So your saying we should be able to carry guns either nowhere or everywhere? Do you also believe we should be allowed to shout 'fire!' either everywhere or nowhere or do you think its okay that you can't do that in crowded places when there's no fire? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 1 month ago* (1 child) 'This shouldn't be allowed everywhere' and 'This should be allowed nowhere' are not the same arguement though, I don't see how my quote fits your argument at all tbh. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] joeljoelle@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) Why are guns only allowed places where they are not, yet they champion their rights every where else. They can't have it both ways. Either we are responsible people with the rights to carry guns places, or we shouldn't have them. I don't know why there is this grey zone, that is conveniently where they happen to be at all times, yet we are the ones constantly put in danger due to the lax gun laws and regulations permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com -7 points 1 month ago* Either we are responsible people with the rights to carry guns places, or we shouldn't have them. So your saying we should be able to carry guns either nowhere or everywhere? Do you also believe we should be allowed to shout 'fire!' either everywhere or nowhere or do you think its okay that you can't do that in crowded places when there's no fire? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] joeljoelle@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) Why are guns only allowed places where they are not, yet they champion their rights every where else. They can't have it both ways. Either we are responsible people with the rights to carry guns places, or we shouldn't have them. I don't know why there is this grey zone, that is conveniently where they happen to be at all times, yet we are the ones constantly put in danger due to the lax gun laws and regulations permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com -7 points 1 month ago* Either we are responsible people with the rights to carry guns places, or we shouldn't have them. So your saying we should be able to carry guns either nowhere or everywhere? Do you also believe we should be allowed to shout 'fire!' either everywhere or nowhere or do you think its okay that you can't do that in crowded places when there's no fire? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com -7 points 1 month ago* Either we are responsible people with the rights to carry guns places, or we shouldn't have them. So your saying we should be able to carry guns either nowhere or everywhere? Do you also believe we should be allowed to shout 'fire!' either everywhere or nowhere or do you think its okay that you can't do that in crowded places when there's no fire? permalink fedilink source parent