you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

Completely missing the reason people balk at a whiff of LLM writing. It automatically is less trusted if it is noticeably LLM written

Instead of pointing to a wrong number, a missing test, a wrong claim, or saying thank you, somebody just writes “sounds AI-generated”.

And it is rude to expect people to proofread your slop.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    And it is rude to expect people to proofread your slop.

    The author isn't defending slop, in fact they hate it too:

    I utterly hate AI-generated content. I don’t want machines to replace personal writing with synthetic filler.

    What they are arguing for is AI assisted proof reading tools, particularly if English isn't your native tongue:

    But a spell checker doesn’t make a post fake. Grammarly didn’t make old posts fake. A machine helping a non-native speaker write more readable English doesn’t make the work fake.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago*

    I don't believe them. If they are getting accused of ai generated so often they feel the need to write a blog about it they are more likely than not peddling slop and upset no one will take their slop seriously.

  • source
  • parent