you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Yeah, I see your point. To paraphrase, it says that they have to make a profit and can't guarantee game sales from their own store to offset any potential subsidisation.

    My point is that Gaben/Valve have billions and don't need the profit from it. So what if some people use it to play games from other stores? They'll be in the minority for sure.

    I guess everyone is too capitalism-brained to see past the profit motive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago*

    I'm not sure you do see my point.

    To be clear, nowhere in that article suggests that valve would be making a profit on the current price, or that they "have to make a profit" - just that they would not sell it under cost.

    I'm genuinely confused how that becomes "profit motive", or shows greed.

  • source
  • parent