22
Are all Virtual Card providers careless with privacy? (pawb.social)
submitted 1 month ago by to c/privacy@programming.dev
9 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I went looking through different virtual card providers for something that'd let me make a purchase I originally intended to use a prepaid for, yet they wouldn't accept it. This led me to looking into Virtual Card providers as they'd work more consistently.

Problematically, Privacy.com seems overkill on what all it demands as far as KYC standards go, and some suggest IronVest as an alternative because it demands less. Yet, their privacy policy explicitly states they can share your information with advertising partners.

I haven't encountered many providers, but seeing this trend, I wanna raise the question: Is there any virtual Card provider that really cares for privacy, and the privacy-minded?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Okay I know people sort by new comments, so I'm just going to keep creating more comments here.

I paused halocard for now, since it does look like it's paid. That makes me hesitate, but also gives me confidence (that its business model isn't glorping up all my data).

I tried wise.com, which looks free, but it also asked for my SSN... which it then said it couldn't verify?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •