you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 48 points 1 month ago (4 children)
  • [+] -14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

    macOS is for people who think people should earn for their work.

    Linux is for people who believe NOBODY should EVER earn money for ANYTHING EVER.

    Don’t believe me? Let’s talk about SuSE. Or Red Hat. Or IBM. All “evil” the second they started charging “money” for the “work” of the “laborers”.

    lol

    Open sources in awesome thing, but people should get paid for their labor without suddenly being considered evil

    And you can debate the abominable labor practices of Apple Inc., but poor labor practices does not devalue their products, no matter how far you twist your logic or philosophy. nor how many childish tantrums you throw.

    You think this sounds like a absurd argument? This is what you all sound like when you talk about macOS. Or even windows (which I have to agree is garbage, but that’s beside the point). Every single time. ridiculously, myopically, one-sided and so ignorantly biased… but nooo… nothing but Linux can ever be acceptable. And any criticism of it or any user of it is worse than the Holocaust.

    You’re all a bunch of childish clowns

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • It's a shame my instance has disabled downvoting.

    Linux is not exclusively for anti-capitalist FOSS-lovers like myself. As you mentioned, there are multiple different corporate distros. Additionally, "The Cloud" runs on Linux: not even Microsoft uses Windows to host their services. And let's not forget Android and Tizen!

    All of that is, however, beside the point. Do you reject Wikipedia because it too is created by volunteers? Software, like knowledge, exists beyond the concept of scarcity.

    If us FLOSS-lovers had our way, no one would ever have to pay for software, as it would be maintained by the community. And of course, most such projects and developers accept donations.

    I hope this does not fall on deaf ears, though I understand that the concept of working to improve the lives of others (and one's own life) without some form of direct payment is... foreign, to many people living under capitalism.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    I am a software engineer who believes software engineers should be paid for their work. I use Linux. Do I mean nothing to you??

    I think most Linux users don’t have a problem with things like RHEL. I personally think it’s great. I don’t personally use it, but I have absolutely no problem with it.

    The actual problem Linux users care about is when people use and modify the Linux kernel (or any other GPL project), distribute the binaries, but don’t distribute the source code. (I’m looking at you, Sony.)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    I've never seen a software freedom or open-source enthusiast make anything remotely like this argument. When we have criticisms of predominantly open-source-based companies, it's usually because they're adding some kind of proprietary scamware into their systems, not because they're charging money for their services.

    Plenty of people and companies have found ways to generate income - yes, even beyond donations - while still respecting other's rights. You're just repeating a lie that's been debunked and dead for years.

  • source
  • parent