▲ 383 ▼ Meta wants a child safety bill rewritten to shield it from lawsuits over harm to kids (www.techspot.com) submitted 1 month ago by sanitation@lemmy.today to c/technology@lemmy.world 25 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] gurty@lemmy.world 72 points 1 month ago (1 child) What an odd thing to want. permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sidebro@lemmy.zip 49 points 1 month ago (3 children) Almost like they don't give a shit if they harm kids permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] rayyy@piefed.social 17 points 1 month ago (1 child) It's either kids or profits for Zuck. Which is more important? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago insert small mexican girl meme Why not both? permalink fedilink source parent [–] NM_Gringo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 child) Or know that they already have harmed kids. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] joeljoelle@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago* I'm sure this is partially what these ID laws are about, they know their product is harmful to not just kids but EVERYONE, but they don't want EVERYONE to stop using it, so what's the answer? Ban the kids permalink fedilink source parent [–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago Almost like they want to profit by harming kids. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sidebro@lemmy.zip 49 points 1 month ago (3 children) Almost like they don't give a shit if they harm kids permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] rayyy@piefed.social 17 points 1 month ago (1 child) It's either kids or profits for Zuck. Which is more important? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago insert small mexican girl meme Why not both? permalink fedilink source parent [–] NM_Gringo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 child) Or know that they already have harmed kids. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] joeljoelle@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago* I'm sure this is partially what these ID laws are about, they know their product is harmful to not just kids but EVERYONE, but they don't want EVERYONE to stop using it, so what's the answer? Ban the kids permalink fedilink source parent [–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago Almost like they want to profit by harming kids. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rayyy@piefed.social 17 points 1 month ago (1 child) It's either kids or profits for Zuck. Which is more important? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago insert small mexican girl meme Why not both? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago insert small mexican girl meme Why not both? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NM_Gringo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 child) Or know that they already have harmed kids. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] joeljoelle@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago* I'm sure this is partially what these ID laws are about, they know their product is harmful to not just kids but EVERYONE, but they don't want EVERYONE to stop using it, so what's the answer? Ban the kids permalink fedilink source parent
[–] joeljoelle@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago* I'm sure this is partially what these ID laws are about, they know their product is harmful to not just kids but EVERYONE, but they don't want EVERYONE to stop using it, so what's the answer? Ban the kids permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago Almost like they want to profit by harming kids. permalink fedilink source parent