22
Are all Virtual Card providers careless with privacy? (pawb.social)
submitted 1 month ago by to c/privacy@programming.dev
9 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I went looking through different virtual card providers for something that'd let me make a purchase I originally intended to use a prepaid for, yet they wouldn't accept it. This led me to looking into Virtual Card providers as they'd work more consistently.

Problematically, Privacy.com seems overkill on what all it demands as far as KYC standards go, and some suggest IronVest as an alternative because it demands less. Yet, their privacy policy explicitly states they can share your information with advertising partners.

I haven't encountered many providers, but seeing this trend, I wanna raise the question: Is there any virtual Card provider that really cares for privacy, and the privacy-minded?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 month ago*

I use privacy.com for some things where I'd rather not share my data with the vendor. I like them, their privacy policy doesn't have anything too weird. I'm also under no allusion that it's subpoena-proof though, but that's not really what I'm looking for for banking anyway.

EDIT: OP appears to be concerned with how they handle the PII they collect. As far as I know, I've never been impacted but tbh how would I know if they didn't tell me? If anyone has heard otherwise, I'd like to know.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent