450
Google Chrome's next update will mark the end of popular ad blockers (9to5google.com)
submitted 1 month ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
128 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Their absolute and stubborn refusal to implement PWA made me give up on Firefox recently.

I tried using Chrome for PWA only and using Firefox for my main browser for a while (to help their market share), but it made it very difficult because external links would open in Chrome.

I've found like 80% of sites I use are self hosted so I found it easier to just stop using websites with ads than dealing with Firefox 😞

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    All this over running web sites as apps? Why would I ever want a website as an app?

    If I understand what you are saying correctly.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    Because installing a native app requires an enormous amount of trust. Every native app running as your user has read access to all data created by every other app including browsers and their secrets like saved credentials to sensitive websites.

    The Linux ecosystem mostly got away with this by being too small to be worth targeting. But several recent events (like the attacks on the AUR) have increasingly shown that we've passed the threshold where that's no longer true.

    So, what am I to use when I don't have the time to go through the source code of every new version of every single app with a fine-toothed comb? Well, browsers (while not perfect) have some level of sandboxing, doing an overall decent job of keeping websites' (apps) data isolated from each other.

    Switching to use web apps whenever possible meant (at least, in Firefox) giving up a lot of the functionality of native apps (like default file associations, dedicated entry in the taskbar, and so many others). They're basically refusing to acknowledge the open web as a platform that solves a real need: providing security and escape from walled-garden app stores (which is the bigger problem on mobile). Instead they're spending their funding on AI, and VPNs, and random other features nobody really asked for.

    While I think it's very important that there is more than one browser implementation in the world, I have 2 choices:

    1. Use Chromium fork to get security and convenience and privacy.
    2. Use Firefox (or its forks) to maybe get privacy at the expense of the other two.
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    That's an interesting take. But you think its safer to use web versions? Sending your data out somewhere else? To keep tabs isolated in firefox I do use containers, so they dont interact, but I have never been a fan of making WPA's, when I could just click on the tab its in or open it in the browser anyways.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    Well, the isolation allows you select what's appropriate for each bit of data.

    For example, my financial data have to live elsewhere - namely the financial institutions I use. I've been paying Todoist $36/year for the past 12 years and they have zero pressure to enshittify, so I'm okay keeping that data elsewhere. I also outsource my email to Fastmail because it's generally inadvisable to self-host email.

    However, for most things that I've started using recently (karakeep, miniflux, baby-buddy, homebox, ghostfolio, and so many others), I've chosen open source apps and run their servers on my homelab. Linux on the server (unlike the desktop) is extremely well funded. There are a ton of different types of container and micro-vm configurations you can mix and match to give the exact level of isolation, resource, filesystem, and network access you're comfortable with.

    Also, I don't think it makes much sense to use proprietary software for much in the future. The cost of software development has been going down at increasing rate for as long as I can remember for a variety of reasons, and LLM-assisted AI Agents is the just the latest iteration. With the latest SOTA models, it doesn't take much to create an maintain a selfhosted OSS app - someone with the will to put in time and the most basic understanding of the basic fundamentals of software engineering.

    Certainly not things I would trust particularly personal or sensitive data with. But remember that breaking out of server-side containers/micro-vms is really hard, and way beyond the capabilities of any AI slop.

    So yeah, from what I've seen so far the best tools out there for enjoying the largest variety of software (including potentially undisclosed AI slop) safely is server-side Linux containers + client-side browser isolation. The closest thing we have to sandboxes in the desktop is flatpak, and it's so trivial to break out that I've watched people do it unintentionally, just trying to make their app work in it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    PWA? Poopy Wet Ass? I know nothing about computing what is PWA

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    Progressive Web Apps, a crack-pipe idea that allows you to install websites as if they were computer applications. Desktop entries, shortcuts, opens as a single window with no URL bar, everything to make it look like a computer application, but it isn’t. It didn’t take off because it’s not a very good idea, with no very good implementations. In my opinion.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    Because installing a native app requires an enormous amount of trust. Every native app running as your user has read access to all data created by every other app including browsers and their secrets like saved credentials.

    The Linux ecosystem mostly got away with this by being too small to be worth targeting. But several recent events (like the attacks on the AUR) have increasingly shown that we've passed the threshold where that's no longer true.

    So, what am I to use when I don't have the time to go through the source code of every new version of every single app with a fine-toothed comb? Well, browsers (while not perfect) have some level of sandboxing, doing an overall decent job of keeping websites' (apps) data isolated from each other.

    Switching to use web apps whenever possible meant (at least, in Firefox) giving up a lot of the functionality of native apps (like default file associations, dedicated entry in the taskbar, and so many others). They're basically refusing to acknowledge the open web as a platform that solves a real need: providing security and escape from walled-garden app stores (which is the bigger problem on mobile). Instead they're spending their funding on AI, and VPNs, and random other features nobody really asked for.

    While I think it's very important that there is more than one browser implementation in the world, I have 2 choices:

    1. Use Chromium fork to get security and convenience and privacy.
    2. Use Firefox (or its forks) to maybe get privacy at the expense of the other two.
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago*

    Viewing a web browser as the “open internet platform” is the crux of this issue that has gone unchecked for years. We turned a document reader into an application environment. This is the issue I have with PWA. A plastic bandage on a festering wound.

    On your points regarding sandboxing, I believe that should’ve been rolled into OS userspaces for years as well, and only developing the technology as it relates to web browsers is a huge oversight that has and will further lead to security issues.

    Not everything needs to be an application but building applications in a document viewer is a bit silly.

    edit: less cynicism; I want to take a moment to charade all the efforts gone into Linux distributions that take sandboxing and immutability seriously. They aren’t very good solutions either, but it all starts somewhere.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent