He can't control how she feels. For all the arguments that women are preconditioned by society to already be placating by default, to turn around and assume that the particular guy in question is the reason she feels the need to be placating is kinda disconnected from the broader feminist narrative.
Unless you cherry-pick every situation based on what suits your preconceived notions the best, in which case what actually sets you apart from a maga? That's literally the same thing they do, and it's not made less disingenuous by the fact that there's a kernel of truth to it (i.e., Tiger is a shitty person, but the particular argument you're making is still disingenuous)
