1588
Landmark German ruling declares Google's AI Overviews are Google's own words and makes it liable for false answers (the-decoder.com)
submitted 1 month ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
135 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

JFC this is so tiring. I’m trying to explain the issues from a technical point of view and you dismiss all I’m saying like I’m crazy or I don’t know anything about the topic.

I get that you like these summaries because you believe that they make your life easier, but the least you could do is educate yourself, read some books, anything.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    You're trying to explain by ignoring my question regarding your source not once but twice.

    And also conveniently ignoring the actual point being made and instead focusing on whether or not its 75% or 85% or what is an algorithm

    And also dismissing arguments because its morally beneath you.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (1 child)

    I cannot make you understand something you refuse to learn anything about.

    But now I get it. Your whole point is that you are so lazy, you are willing to trade accuracy of information and your own privacy, for the convenience of not having to read anything for more than ten seconds straight. I should have known from the moment you so confidently said that “AI is costing [you] nothing”. Sure mate.

    Given all that, providing sources and facts from experience has been a waste of time from my part. No more.

    No worries though, you won’t need to be intentionally obtuse for longer, outsourcing your thought processes to Google will do that for you, and for free.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    You sure are doing a great job helping people understand when you, for the third time, refuse to answer the question about where your source refers to accuracy. You haven't provided jack.

    You sure also sound quite prideful to the fact that this is just about me and my preferences, that you can't see this is actually how most people view the world.

    Tell me, actually answer me here instead of deflecting: Do you really think the world is just stupid? They all use google or Gmail or YouTube or Facebook and dont realize their data is being collected? You think if you just help educate them they will all realize and stop using these services?

    No worries though, you won’t need to be intentionally obtuse for longer, outsourcing your thought processes to Google will do that for you, and for free.

    I have no worries here. I'm not the one that's going to fall behind while screaming at the clouds as tech keeps rolling along.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago

    I have no worries here. I'm not the one that's going to fall behind while screaming at the clouds as tech keeps rolling along.

    You really believe that asking questions to a chatbot is a skill? Good luck to you then lol

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent