▲ 190 ▼ GOP gov posts picture of James Talarico as a woman while attacking his climate action bill. Talarico cares about the environment, which means he’s a woman? (www.lgbtqnation.com) submitted 1 month ago by sanitation@lemmy.today to c/politics@lemmy.world 40 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] treehugger6@lemmy.world 66 points 1 month ago (5 children) I'll never understand this. You live on this planet! Why wouldn't you want it to be livable, you goddamn FOOL! permalink fedilink source hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website 36 points 1 month ago* (1 child) There’s a lot of video of Reagan talking about climate change and how it will need to have both side to work on it, that it will be the major 20th century problem, etc. … and the edge fund (fully invested into petroleum) saw it as an attack on their profit and bought the politicians. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SteveCC@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 child) Did a DDG search for video and came up empty. Articles - plenty. Video - nothing. You? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website 18 points 1 month ago (1 child) https://climatecontroljournal.com/did-ronald-reagan-think-that-the-earth-was-warming.html That’s just for a quick search permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SteveCC@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago Thanks Found this there - https://youtu.be/oaH5eAE95Lk permalink fedilink source parent [–] mercano@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 child) There’s so much more profit to be made if you exploit the environment, and the oligarchs plan on the consequences not catching up to them before they die of old age. (At least, not any consequences they can’t buy their way out of.) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] treehugger6@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (1 child) It makes me so sad seeing nature being destroyed for fucking profit. I can't even put it into words permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] killea@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago It's so incredibly shallow and awful. They don't even seem to give a shit about their own offspring. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago Narcissism is a plague permalink fedilink source parent [–] kinsnik@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (2 children) laissez-faire capitalism doens't actually work if externalities need to be factored in the price permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 month ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) Laissez-faire capitalism is a cancer. It's also impossible, since it has two contradictory meanings: a market with no regulations, and a market free from barriers to entry. But an unregulated market will always degenerate to an oligopoly, and oligopolists always end up rigging their markets. That's why my definition of a libertarian is someone who doesn't understand second-order effects. Their whole world view is doggy-doggy horsey-horsey linear relations. It's even dumber than being crudely mechanistic. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago For all of my life, the cons basically coded caring about the environment, about animals, as being gay. I don't think it was ever otherwise. I've been vegetarian for decades, now, too, and I knew pretty much what to expect, and I can assure you - virtually every omnivore man (and quite a few women, too) more or less eventually gets around to insinuating that I am not quite manly enough because of it. And not just cons, but yeah, virtually all of the cons do this. Just watch how the likes of Jesse Watters focuses on things like crossing legs, FFS. There are certain types of men (and women, too, unfortunately - they don't get a pass on this either) that will just obsess on this kind of thing, nonstop. They are constantly running their weird version of gaydar on all kinds of behaviors, including caring about the environment. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website 36 points 1 month ago* (1 child) There’s a lot of video of Reagan talking about climate change and how it will need to have both side to work on it, that it will be the major 20th century problem, etc. … and the edge fund (fully invested into petroleum) saw it as an attack on their profit and bought the politicians. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SteveCC@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 child) Did a DDG search for video and came up empty. Articles - plenty. Video - nothing. You? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website 18 points 1 month ago (1 child) https://climatecontroljournal.com/did-ronald-reagan-think-that-the-earth-was-warming.html That’s just for a quick search permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SteveCC@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago Thanks Found this there - https://youtu.be/oaH5eAE95Lk permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SteveCC@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 child) Did a DDG search for video and came up empty. Articles - plenty. Video - nothing. You? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website 18 points 1 month ago (1 child) https://climatecontroljournal.com/did-ronald-reagan-think-that-the-earth-was-warming.html That’s just for a quick search permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SteveCC@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago Thanks Found this there - https://youtu.be/oaH5eAE95Lk permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website 18 points 1 month ago (1 child) https://climatecontroljournal.com/did-ronald-reagan-think-that-the-earth-was-warming.html That’s just for a quick search permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SteveCC@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago Thanks Found this there - https://youtu.be/oaH5eAE95Lk permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SteveCC@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago Thanks Found this there - https://youtu.be/oaH5eAE95Lk permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mercano@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 child) There’s so much more profit to be made if you exploit the environment, and the oligarchs plan on the consequences not catching up to them before they die of old age. (At least, not any consequences they can’t buy their way out of.) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] treehugger6@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (1 child) It makes me so sad seeing nature being destroyed for fucking profit. I can't even put it into words permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] killea@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago It's so incredibly shallow and awful. They don't even seem to give a shit about their own offspring. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] treehugger6@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (1 child) It makes me so sad seeing nature being destroyed for fucking profit. I can't even put it into words permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] killea@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago It's so incredibly shallow and awful. They don't even seem to give a shit about their own offspring. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] killea@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago It's so incredibly shallow and awful. They don't even seem to give a shit about their own offspring. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kinsnik@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (2 children) laissez-faire capitalism doens't actually work if externalities need to be factored in the price permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 month ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) Laissez-faire capitalism is a cancer. It's also impossible, since it has two contradictory meanings: a market with no regulations, and a market free from barriers to entry. But an unregulated market will always degenerate to an oligopoly, and oligopolists always end up rigging their markets. That's why my definition of a libertarian is someone who doesn't understand second-order effects. Their whole world view is doggy-doggy horsey-horsey linear relations. It's even dumber than being crudely mechanistic. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) Laissez-faire capitalism is a cancer. It's also impossible, since it has two contradictory meanings: a market with no regulations, and a market free from barriers to entry. But an unregulated market will always degenerate to an oligopoly, and oligopolists always end up rigging their markets. That's why my definition of a libertarian is someone who doesn't understand second-order effects. Their whole world view is doggy-doggy horsey-horsey linear relations. It's even dumber than being crudely mechanistic. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago For all of my life, the cons basically coded caring about the environment, about animals, as being gay. I don't think it was ever otherwise. I've been vegetarian for decades, now, too, and I knew pretty much what to expect, and I can assure you - virtually every omnivore man (and quite a few women, too) more or less eventually gets around to insinuating that I am not quite manly enough because of it. And not just cons, but yeah, virtually all of the cons do this. Just watch how the likes of Jesse Watters focuses on things like crossing legs, FFS. There are certain types of men (and women, too, unfortunately - they don't get a pass on this either) that will just obsess on this kind of thing, nonstop. They are constantly running their weird version of gaydar on all kinds of behaviors, including caring about the environment. permalink fedilink source parent