▲ 656 ▼ Microsoft doesn't know what to do about the memory pricing crisis Microsoft is causing (www.pcgamer.com) submitted 1 month ago by sanitation@lemmy.today to c/technology@lemmy.world 86 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] NightTitan@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 child) But does anyone need ai companies? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Psiczar@aussie.zone 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) The fact that the major players are still in business means someone thinks so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 child) Are they still 'in business' though? They're burning through money they don't even have at a never before seen rate. Just to make barely useful software that works 20% of the time at best. I feel like it's the same as saying the banks and real estate companies were 'still in business' in 2008. Naturally, time will tell if it's the same cycle repeating. So far everything seems to be pointing in that direction. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Psiczar@aussie.zone 1 point 1 month ago Many companies operate without making a profit, sometimes it’s because they aren’t making enough money and sometimes they invest it back into the business. Regardless, SpaceX is about to go public with a valuation of $1.8 trillion, and they arent profitable. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Psiczar@aussie.zone 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) The fact that the major players are still in business means someone thinks so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 child) Are they still 'in business' though? They're burning through money they don't even have at a never before seen rate. Just to make barely useful software that works 20% of the time at best. I feel like it's the same as saying the banks and real estate companies were 'still in business' in 2008. Naturally, time will tell if it's the same cycle repeating. So far everything seems to be pointing in that direction. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Psiczar@aussie.zone 1 point 1 month ago Many companies operate without making a profit, sometimes it’s because they aren’t making enough money and sometimes they invest it back into the business. Regardless, SpaceX is about to go public with a valuation of $1.8 trillion, and they arent profitable. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 child) Are they still 'in business' though? They're burning through money they don't even have at a never before seen rate. Just to make barely useful software that works 20% of the time at best. I feel like it's the same as saying the banks and real estate companies were 'still in business' in 2008. Naturally, time will tell if it's the same cycle repeating. So far everything seems to be pointing in that direction. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Psiczar@aussie.zone 1 point 1 month ago Many companies operate without making a profit, sometimes it’s because they aren’t making enough money and sometimes they invest it back into the business. Regardless, SpaceX is about to go public with a valuation of $1.8 trillion, and they arent profitable. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Psiczar@aussie.zone 1 point 1 month ago Many companies operate without making a profit, sometimes it’s because they aren’t making enough money and sometimes they invest it back into the business. Regardless, SpaceX is about to go public with a valuation of $1.8 trillion, and they arent profitable. permalink fedilink source parent