Potentially impacting all AI search engines and chatbots known to poorly paraphrase source links, a German court has ruled that Google is liable for false statements in AI Overviews.

The ruling came in a case flagged by The Decoder, where two publishers found that Google’s AI Overviews incorrectly linked them to scams and other sketchy business practices. After smearing publishers by making affirmative statements like “Yes, [it] is known for dubious business practices and is often perceived as a scam,” Google failed to correct the misleading output, even after the publishers sent a cease-and-desist letter earlier this year.

Google tried the usual arguments to shield itself from liability for false statements in AI Overviews, such as arguing that most users understand that AI outputs aren’t always accurate and must be verified.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Alphabet's CEO would run you down with a bus if they thought it would make their stock go up...

Why defend them when they've shown nothing but contempt for their customers?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    Why defend them when they’ve shown nothing but contempt for their customers?

    Because I don't want to let hate blind me to a reasonable opinion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    AI has made their search engine worse not better..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago

    It objectively did, but that is beside the point. If they're getting some of the lost customers back by adding "gemeni overview" then they they're justified. There's no point in cooking michelin star level food if your customers mostly go to KFC.

  • source
  • parent