The lawyers on both sides of a federal court case in Mississippi were caught using artificial intelligence, a situation where, effectively, generative AI tools were used to argue against each other.

The judge wrote in a blistering sanctions order, that the lawyers wasted the court’s time, and that “in an era of rampant unverified AI usage within the legal field, this case presents a prime example of the risk associated with serving as a rubber-stamp.”

“This case presents the Court with an unusual scenario—attorneys for both litigants engaged in similar sanctionable conduct,” Sharion Aycock, senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of Mississippi wrote in a sanctions order. “This court is yet again ‘burdened with addressing AI hallucinations court filings.’”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

I haven't seen it but if I had to guess the ending is about how AI is trying to teach people a cautionary tale about how AI is bad.

How far off am I?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments