▲ 344 ▼ Pluto is still a planet, just a dwarf one (thelemmy.club) submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Grumpus_Maximus@thelemmy.club to c/historymemes@piefed.social 89 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] frog@feddit.uk 15 points 1 month ago (4 children) The Earth's Moon is about 1.5 times bigger than Pluto. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] mrsemi@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (1 child) in Asimov's Foundation series, there is (was) a galaxy-spanning human civilization, but Earth was lost and mostly considered mythical. One of the arguments against it actually existing was the absurdity of such a double planet system existing. In the wider galaxy only giant planets had such large satellites. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago In his books were they similarly absurdly tiny, rotating in irregular orbits well outside of their class of planets, and inhabiting an entire solar system of similarly sized unremarkable objects? permalink fedilink source parent [–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 12 points 1 month ago And Titan is 6% bigger than Mercury. permalink fedilink source parent [–] bob_lemon@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago And the 2006 decimation of planet that made Pluto not a planet explicitly added "must not orbit another object" to stop the moon from being a planet. permalink fedilink source parent [–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) The earth's moon is an extreme outlier to our knowledge. Thea made our world weird permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frog@feddit.uk 1 point 1 month ago Is it an outlier because the moon is a pretty big satellite for such a snall planet? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mrsemi@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (1 child) in Asimov's Foundation series, there is (was) a galaxy-spanning human civilization, but Earth was lost and mostly considered mythical. One of the arguments against it actually existing was the absurdity of such a double planet system existing. In the wider galaxy only giant planets had such large satellites. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago In his books were they similarly absurdly tiny, rotating in irregular orbits well outside of their class of planets, and inhabiting an entire solar system of similarly sized unremarkable objects? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago In his books were they similarly absurdly tiny, rotating in irregular orbits well outside of their class of planets, and inhabiting an entire solar system of similarly sized unremarkable objects? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 12 points 1 month ago And Titan is 6% bigger than Mercury. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bob_lemon@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago And the 2006 decimation of planet that made Pluto not a planet explicitly added "must not orbit another object" to stop the moon from being a planet. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) The earth's moon is an extreme outlier to our knowledge. Thea made our world weird permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frog@feddit.uk 1 point 1 month ago Is it an outlier because the moon is a pretty big satellite for such a snall planet? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] frog@feddit.uk 1 point 1 month ago Is it an outlier because the moon is a pretty big satellite for such a snall planet? permalink fedilink source parent