you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 0 points 1 month ago (1 child)

You mean inconvenient. At this point, it's a lot less hassle just to use sepa instant.

I want to send you money.

"Hey, does your bank support wero? Great. I need your phone number. No, my bank doesn't support sending to emails. OK, I saved it to my contacts, I can now open my bank app and send you your 5โ‚ฌ."

vs

"5โ‚ฌ? Sure. opens banking app what's your iban? OK, done"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    Having to use a 34 character number does not seem better though

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    15 for a phone number, so only twice as bad.

    And then not, as Iban has a checksum so you'll directly see errors, as opposed to a phone which will just reach the wrong person

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    15 for a phone number? Where do you live too have such a big number? Here I have only 9 and phone numbers are easily remembered, most people know their own number, and bet <1% of people are know their IBAN.

    You are trying to invent a scenario where IBAN transfers are simple, but that's simply not true, otherwise payment methods such as wero wouldn't even exist

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments