▲ 807 ▼ Zionism must be held accountable (lemmy.world) submitted 1 month ago by K1nsey6@lemmy.world [M] to c/latestagecapitalism@lemmy.world 80 comments fedilink hide all child comments https://genocide.live/
[+] brucethemoose@lemmy.world -22 points 1 month ago* (4 children) Votes are technically public, so technically there’s nothing wrong with this, but doxxing voters still feels slimey. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world [S] 34 points 1 month ago (1 child) Doxxing implies I provided personally identifying info like home addresses, work locations, telephone numbers, other social media accounts, etc. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] brucethemoose@lemmy.world -11 points 1 month ago* (3 children) You know what I meant. Encouraging brigading, to be more precise. Lemmy keeps that info hidden by default for a reason. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] athatet@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 month ago (1 child) Perhaps zionists should be brigaded. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago* Even then, I think it’s a bad precedent. It makes Lemmy feel toxic. I don’t think votes should be private (as that leads to all sorts of complications, especially with fighting bots/spammers), but I think Lemmy/Piefed should encourage a culture of not highlighting it, unless it’s strictly for a spammer or some other objective rules violation. permalink fedilink source parent [–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world [S] 8 points 1 month ago (1 child) So you don't know brigading is either? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago* Lemmy hides it by default. They hide it for a reason, whatever you want to define that reason as. It feels icky to work around by posting the list of downvotes. I’ll debate over that, but I’m not going to beat around the bush or start a snarky semantics argument over a linguistic error I made. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) Well, that's an important distinction permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 child) Yeah. I made a linguistic error. Point is, it feels icky, which is why it’s hidden by default. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lemmingnosis@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 child) The likely chilling effects are obvious to me. Who’d want to (intentionally or accidentally) tap a button on this site when someone’s gonna post your username for it? Punishment for using default features is concerning for a platform. If we needed thought police they’d probably make downvotes more visible to us. We can already keep bad content in its place by downvoting it ourselves. We can use logs to investigate brigaging and stalking-to-downvote and suspicious mass upvoting, etc. We owe other users restraint if we want them to come back. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (1 child) Agreed. This is what I was getting at, and you put better than I could. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lemmingnosis@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago Noticed good behavior on my comment. When a user (whose name I do not need to be told by a third party) believed I didn’t add to the discussion, they used a platform voting feature as intended. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RavingGrob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 month ago That isn't Doxxing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago Do you even know what Doxxing is? Calling users out for defending genocide isn't doxxing. Finding out their real names, addresses, places of work, etc.. That's Doxxing. permalink fedilink source parent [+] elevenbones@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 month ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world [S] 34 points 1 month ago (1 child) Doxxing implies I provided personally identifying info like home addresses, work locations, telephone numbers, other social media accounts, etc. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] brucethemoose@lemmy.world -11 points 1 month ago* (3 children) You know what I meant. Encouraging brigading, to be more precise. Lemmy keeps that info hidden by default for a reason. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] athatet@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 month ago (1 child) Perhaps zionists should be brigaded. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago* Even then, I think it’s a bad precedent. It makes Lemmy feel toxic. I don’t think votes should be private (as that leads to all sorts of complications, especially with fighting bots/spammers), but I think Lemmy/Piefed should encourage a culture of not highlighting it, unless it’s strictly for a spammer or some other objective rules violation. permalink fedilink source parent [–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world [S] 8 points 1 month ago (1 child) So you don't know brigading is either? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago* Lemmy hides it by default. They hide it for a reason, whatever you want to define that reason as. It feels icky to work around by posting the list of downvotes. I’ll debate over that, but I’m not going to beat around the bush or start a snarky semantics argument over a linguistic error I made. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) Well, that's an important distinction permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 child) Yeah. I made a linguistic error. Point is, it feels icky, which is why it’s hidden by default. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lemmingnosis@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 child) The likely chilling effects are obvious to me. Who’d want to (intentionally or accidentally) tap a button on this site when someone’s gonna post your username for it? Punishment for using default features is concerning for a platform. If we needed thought police they’d probably make downvotes more visible to us. We can already keep bad content in its place by downvoting it ourselves. We can use logs to investigate brigaging and stalking-to-downvote and suspicious mass upvoting, etc. We owe other users restraint if we want them to come back. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (1 child) Agreed. This is what I was getting at, and you put better than I could. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lemmingnosis@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago Noticed good behavior on my comment. When a user (whose name I do not need to be told by a third party) believed I didn’t add to the discussion, they used a platform voting feature as intended. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] brucethemoose@lemmy.world -11 points 1 month ago* (3 children) You know what I meant. Encouraging brigading, to be more precise. Lemmy keeps that info hidden by default for a reason. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] athatet@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 month ago (1 child) Perhaps zionists should be brigaded. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago* Even then, I think it’s a bad precedent. It makes Lemmy feel toxic. I don’t think votes should be private (as that leads to all sorts of complications, especially with fighting bots/spammers), but I think Lemmy/Piefed should encourage a culture of not highlighting it, unless it’s strictly for a spammer or some other objective rules violation. permalink fedilink source parent [–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world [S] 8 points 1 month ago (1 child) So you don't know brigading is either? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago* Lemmy hides it by default. They hide it for a reason, whatever you want to define that reason as. It feels icky to work around by posting the list of downvotes. I’ll debate over that, but I’m not going to beat around the bush or start a snarky semantics argument over a linguistic error I made. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) Well, that's an important distinction permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 child) Yeah. I made a linguistic error. Point is, it feels icky, which is why it’s hidden by default. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lemmingnosis@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 child) The likely chilling effects are obvious to me. Who’d want to (intentionally or accidentally) tap a button on this site when someone’s gonna post your username for it? Punishment for using default features is concerning for a platform. If we needed thought police they’d probably make downvotes more visible to us. We can already keep bad content in its place by downvoting it ourselves. We can use logs to investigate brigaging and stalking-to-downvote and suspicious mass upvoting, etc. We owe other users restraint if we want them to come back. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (1 child) Agreed. This is what I was getting at, and you put better than I could. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lemmingnosis@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago Noticed good behavior on my comment. When a user (whose name I do not need to be told by a third party) believed I didn’t add to the discussion, they used a platform voting feature as intended. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 month ago (1 child) Perhaps zionists should be brigaded. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago* Even then, I think it’s a bad precedent. It makes Lemmy feel toxic. I don’t think votes should be private (as that leads to all sorts of complications, especially with fighting bots/spammers), but I think Lemmy/Piefed should encourage a culture of not highlighting it, unless it’s strictly for a spammer or some other objective rules violation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago* Even then, I think it’s a bad precedent. It makes Lemmy feel toxic. I don’t think votes should be private (as that leads to all sorts of complications, especially with fighting bots/spammers), but I think Lemmy/Piefed should encourage a culture of not highlighting it, unless it’s strictly for a spammer or some other objective rules violation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world [S] 8 points 1 month ago (1 child) So you don't know brigading is either? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago* Lemmy hides it by default. They hide it for a reason, whatever you want to define that reason as. It feels icky to work around by posting the list of downvotes. I’ll debate over that, but I’m not going to beat around the bush or start a snarky semantics argument over a linguistic error I made. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago* Lemmy hides it by default. They hide it for a reason, whatever you want to define that reason as. It feels icky to work around by posting the list of downvotes. I’ll debate over that, but I’m not going to beat around the bush or start a snarky semantics argument over a linguistic error I made. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) Well, that's an important distinction permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 child) Yeah. I made a linguistic error. Point is, it feels icky, which is why it’s hidden by default. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lemmingnosis@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 child) The likely chilling effects are obvious to me. Who’d want to (intentionally or accidentally) tap a button on this site when someone’s gonna post your username for it? Punishment for using default features is concerning for a platform. If we needed thought police they’d probably make downvotes more visible to us. We can already keep bad content in its place by downvoting it ourselves. We can use logs to investigate brigaging and stalking-to-downvote and suspicious mass upvoting, etc. We owe other users restraint if we want them to come back. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (1 child) Agreed. This is what I was getting at, and you put better than I could. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lemmingnosis@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago Noticed good behavior on my comment. When a user (whose name I do not need to be told by a third party) believed I didn’t add to the discussion, they used a platform voting feature as intended. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 child) Yeah. I made a linguistic error. Point is, it feels icky, which is why it’s hidden by default. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lemmingnosis@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 child) The likely chilling effects are obvious to me. Who’d want to (intentionally or accidentally) tap a button on this site when someone’s gonna post your username for it? Punishment for using default features is concerning for a platform. If we needed thought police they’d probably make downvotes more visible to us. We can already keep bad content in its place by downvoting it ourselves. We can use logs to investigate brigaging and stalking-to-downvote and suspicious mass upvoting, etc. We owe other users restraint if we want them to come back. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (1 child) Agreed. This is what I was getting at, and you put better than I could. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lemmingnosis@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago Noticed good behavior on my comment. When a user (whose name I do not need to be told by a third party) believed I didn’t add to the discussion, they used a platform voting feature as intended. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lemmingnosis@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 child) The likely chilling effects are obvious to me. Who’d want to (intentionally or accidentally) tap a button on this site when someone’s gonna post your username for it? Punishment for using default features is concerning for a platform. If we needed thought police they’d probably make downvotes more visible to us. We can already keep bad content in its place by downvoting it ourselves. We can use logs to investigate brigaging and stalking-to-downvote and suspicious mass upvoting, etc. We owe other users restraint if we want them to come back. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (1 child) Agreed. This is what I was getting at, and you put better than I could. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lemmingnosis@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago Noticed good behavior on my comment. When a user (whose name I do not need to be told by a third party) believed I didn’t add to the discussion, they used a platform voting feature as intended. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (1 child) Agreed. This is what I was getting at, and you put better than I could. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lemmingnosis@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago Noticed good behavior on my comment. When a user (whose name I do not need to be told by a third party) believed I didn’t add to the discussion, they used a platform voting feature as intended. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lemmingnosis@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago Noticed good behavior on my comment. When a user (whose name I do not need to be told by a third party) believed I didn’t add to the discussion, they used a platform voting feature as intended. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RavingGrob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 month ago That isn't Doxxing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago Do you even know what Doxxing is? Calling users out for defending genocide isn't doxxing. Finding out their real names, addresses, places of work, etc.. That's Doxxing. permalink fedilink source parent