▲ 106 ▼ What's the biggest misconception you think many people have? (lemmy.world) submitted 2 months ago by Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world 244 comments fedilink hide all child comments Ideally the answers aren't just political soapboxing.
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 51 points 2 months ago (6 children) That understanding someone or something means agreeing with them. permalink fedilink source hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago (1 child) Or that refusing to understand is a valid counterargument. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] plutopos@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 months ago But no one explicitly refuses to understand. Usually it's person A doesn't agree with person B, and person B thinks person A refuses to understand, while in reality person A understands perfectly but disagrees permalink fedilink source parent [–] Drusas@fedia.io 18 points 2 months ago (1 child) Way too many people think that if you explain something, you're endorsing it--even when you explicitly say that you do not endorse it. So frustrating, and it's a huge problem here on the fediverse. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago Exactly. Like, how do you expect to beat an opponent if your refuse to understand why they do what they do? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Today@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago Or that not vocally disagreeing is agreement. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MufinMcFlufin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago On a related note, this is one of my favorite quotes: "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." -Aristotle permalink fedilink source parent [–] Subscript5676@piefed.ca 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) Folks, you can understand why someone decided to kill themselves: e.g. a tragic life, and from their perspective, there's no one to support them, no one to love them, no one for them to love. But it doesn't mean you agree with their decision to kill themselves. If understanding = agreeing, a lot more people would be committing suicide while trying to understand why such a person would kill themselves. It makes no logical sense. Or it means that those alive is either of these: they either don't understand it out of naivety, or choose to not understand it to not kill themselves. Assuming it's an adult with their full faculty, who witnessed such a tragedy, that's just... such a sad world. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world [S] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) I'm not sure if its get what you mean. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 child) For example, I can put in the effort to try and understand why a triple Trumper MAGA Republican did what they did without agreeing with the actions they took. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world [S] 6 points 2 months ago Oh jesus I'm a moron lmao. I misread what you said given the context of my post. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago (1 child) Or that refusing to understand is a valid counterargument. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] plutopos@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 months ago But no one explicitly refuses to understand. Usually it's person A doesn't agree with person B, and person B thinks person A refuses to understand, while in reality person A understands perfectly but disagrees permalink fedilink source parent
[–] plutopos@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 months ago But no one explicitly refuses to understand. Usually it's person A doesn't agree with person B, and person B thinks person A refuses to understand, while in reality person A understands perfectly but disagrees permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Drusas@fedia.io 18 points 2 months ago (1 child) Way too many people think that if you explain something, you're endorsing it--even when you explicitly say that you do not endorse it. So frustrating, and it's a huge problem here on the fediverse. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago Exactly. Like, how do you expect to beat an opponent if your refuse to understand why they do what they do? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago Exactly. Like, how do you expect to beat an opponent if your refuse to understand why they do what they do? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Today@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago Or that not vocally disagreeing is agreement. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MufinMcFlufin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago On a related note, this is one of my favorite quotes: "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." -Aristotle permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Subscript5676@piefed.ca 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) Folks, you can understand why someone decided to kill themselves: e.g. a tragic life, and from their perspective, there's no one to support them, no one to love them, no one for them to love. But it doesn't mean you agree with their decision to kill themselves. If understanding = agreeing, a lot more people would be committing suicide while trying to understand why such a person would kill themselves. It makes no logical sense. Or it means that those alive is either of these: they either don't understand it out of naivety, or choose to not understand it to not kill themselves. Assuming it's an adult with their full faculty, who witnessed such a tragedy, that's just... such a sad world. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world [S] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) I'm not sure if its get what you mean. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 child) For example, I can put in the effort to try and understand why a triple Trumper MAGA Republican did what they did without agreeing with the actions they took. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world [S] 6 points 2 months ago Oh jesus I'm a moron lmao. I misread what you said given the context of my post. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 child) For example, I can put in the effort to try and understand why a triple Trumper MAGA Republican did what they did without agreeing with the actions they took. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world [S] 6 points 2 months ago Oh jesus I'm a moron lmao. I misread what you said given the context of my post. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world [S] 6 points 2 months ago Oh jesus I'm a moron lmao. I misread what you said given the context of my post. permalink fedilink source parent