Archive: [ https://archive.is/OTfZe ]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

You're just saying that treating tobacco-related cancer is paid for by the whole population. That's it folks! If anyone is inferring something from that, well, that's clearly on them.

Edit: saw the deleted reply

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    No, I'm saying that preventable tobacco related cancers are paid by all contributors to the solidary health insurance. I'm not sure where the other commenter's nephew 6mo cancer fits in this.

    Help me understand where I'm wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah, like if somebody inferred that somebody smoking and getting cancer isn't hurting just themselves, but indirectly also the entire population, especially people with chronic diseases. No way they would imply it's in everyone's interests to stop smoking across the entire population, they're only saying things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments