▲ 476 ▼ diogenes would be prule (lemmy.blahaj.zone) submitted 3 months ago by cadmiumsandbox@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] tar@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 months ago I bet this exact rebuttal appears in the southern journal of philosophy ca. 1967 permalink fedilink source parent