▲ -59 ▼ whats going on with womensstuff? (piefed.world) submitted 2 months ago* by billnyethescienceguy@piefed.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world 156 comments fedilink hide all child comments 90% of it is just misandrist bait, and its just an echochamber of misandry.
[–] sixtoe@lemmy.blahaj.zone -3 points 2 months ago (2 children) Misandry does not exist. permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (2 children) Louder for the back! Misandry isn’t the reverse of misogyny. There’s no anti-men power structures being kept in place by women, there isn’t women-dominated governments stripping men of their rights, there’s no systemic violence against men perpetuated by women in power. There are certainly individuals that hate men, but misandry simply doesn’t exist the same way misogyny does. Thank you for your comment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] jjagaimo@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child) You've mistaken misogyny/misandry with patriarcy/matriarchy. Misandry is by definition the hatred of, distrust of, or prejudice against men, as misogyny is the same against women. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago (3 children) You’ve mistaken institutional sexism with individual sexism. As I said previously, individuals can be misandrist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] jjagaimo@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago (1 child) misandry isnt the reverse of misogyny Except it is permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 months ago You're ignoring all the context in that paragraph. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) "Doesn't exist" is a weird way of saying "it's not as prevalent as the other thing". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago It doesn’t exist the way misogyny does. They’re not equivalent. permalink fedilink source parent [–] sixtoe@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 months ago (1 child) Lorena and Aileen. 💜 Yeah. I'm that individual. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago Good for you 💕 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 child) To be precise, misandry exists, but it doesn't have the same societal support that mysogyny does. Both exist, but one has a noticeable effect in the broader world where as the other mostly has effects only in limited spaces where the individual has enough control to override the default power imbalance. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 months ago Thank you for expanding on my comment. Institutional misandry doesn’t exist is the more precise parent statement. permalink fedilink source parent [–] billnyethescienceguy@piefed.world [S] -3 points 2 months ago (1 child) You do not exist. Wake up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago Continuing to police women, I see. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (2 children) Louder for the back! Misandry isn’t the reverse of misogyny. There’s no anti-men power structures being kept in place by women, there isn’t women-dominated governments stripping men of their rights, there’s no systemic violence against men perpetuated by women in power. There are certainly individuals that hate men, but misandry simply doesn’t exist the same way misogyny does. Thank you for your comment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] jjagaimo@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child) You've mistaken misogyny/misandry with patriarcy/matriarchy. Misandry is by definition the hatred of, distrust of, or prejudice against men, as misogyny is the same against women. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago (3 children) You’ve mistaken institutional sexism with individual sexism. As I said previously, individuals can be misandrist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] jjagaimo@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago (1 child) misandry isnt the reverse of misogyny Except it is permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 months ago You're ignoring all the context in that paragraph. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) "Doesn't exist" is a weird way of saying "it's not as prevalent as the other thing". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago It doesn’t exist the way misogyny does. They’re not equivalent. permalink fedilink source parent [–] sixtoe@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 months ago (1 child) Lorena and Aileen. 💜 Yeah. I'm that individual. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago Good for you 💕 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 child) To be precise, misandry exists, but it doesn't have the same societal support that mysogyny does. Both exist, but one has a noticeable effect in the broader world where as the other mostly has effects only in limited spaces where the individual has enough control to override the default power imbalance. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 months ago Thank you for expanding on my comment. Institutional misandry doesn’t exist is the more precise parent statement. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jjagaimo@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child) You've mistaken misogyny/misandry with patriarcy/matriarchy. Misandry is by definition the hatred of, distrust of, or prejudice against men, as misogyny is the same against women. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago (3 children) You’ve mistaken institutional sexism with individual sexism. As I said previously, individuals can be misandrist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] jjagaimo@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago (1 child) misandry isnt the reverse of misogyny Except it is permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 months ago You're ignoring all the context in that paragraph. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) "Doesn't exist" is a weird way of saying "it's not as prevalent as the other thing". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago It doesn’t exist the way misogyny does. They’re not equivalent. permalink fedilink source parent [–] sixtoe@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 months ago (1 child) Lorena and Aileen. 💜 Yeah. I'm that individual. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago Good for you 💕 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago (3 children) You’ve mistaken institutional sexism with individual sexism. As I said previously, individuals can be misandrist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] jjagaimo@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago (1 child) misandry isnt the reverse of misogyny Except it is permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 months ago You're ignoring all the context in that paragraph. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) "Doesn't exist" is a weird way of saying "it's not as prevalent as the other thing". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago It doesn’t exist the way misogyny does. They’re not equivalent. permalink fedilink source parent [–] sixtoe@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 months ago (1 child) Lorena and Aileen. 💜 Yeah. I'm that individual. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago Good for you 💕 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jjagaimo@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago (1 child) misandry isnt the reverse of misogyny Except it is permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 months ago You're ignoring all the context in that paragraph. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 months ago You're ignoring all the context in that paragraph. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) "Doesn't exist" is a weird way of saying "it's not as prevalent as the other thing". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago It doesn’t exist the way misogyny does. They’re not equivalent. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago It doesn’t exist the way misogyny does. They’re not equivalent. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sixtoe@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 months ago (1 child) Lorena and Aileen. 💜 Yeah. I'm that individual. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago Good for you 💕 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 child) To be precise, misandry exists, but it doesn't have the same societal support that mysogyny does. Both exist, but one has a noticeable effect in the broader world where as the other mostly has effects only in limited spaces where the individual has enough control to override the default power imbalance. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 months ago Thank you for expanding on my comment. Institutional misandry doesn’t exist is the more precise parent statement. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 months ago Thank you for expanding on my comment. Institutional misandry doesn’t exist is the more precise parent statement. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] billnyethescienceguy@piefed.world [S] -3 points 2 months ago (1 child) You do not exist. Wake up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago Continuing to police women, I see. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago Continuing to police women, I see. permalink fedilink source parent