you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Agreed but I don't think terrorism is the way. If anything, it's temporary.

And "much" didn't improve. Much would have improved if the economy was redistributed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    And just how do you intend to do that? I do have an alternate plan, but I would love to hear this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    We can start by removing the right to vote from Trump voters. Anyone who chooses the leader of the global economy so irresponsibly doesn't deserve democracy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    That's some trolley problem you've got worked out there...

    Leave the switch and the world suffers.

    Switch to track two and like 100 billionaires die.

    Switch to track three and we remove basic rights from half the common people who are the most susceptible to the psychological warfare enacted by all the people on track two.

    People that support billionaires are morons, but we still should punish the trickster and not the tricked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Its not terrorism its pest control but also terrorism absolutely works on billionaires even if 8t doesn't always work on everybody

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    I'll believe you when it happens.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Look at all the people who got healthcare that was out if terror

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    UHC is still denying claims. There was a temporary uptick in approvals until the interim CEO was inevitably replaced by someone who has the "shareholder's priorities" in mind.

    The whole system needs to change. Cutting fingers off of the dragon one-by-one is not much of a plan.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    Do you really want to rely on fear to have that happen? Or do you want a system where people wouldn't have to suffer that way?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    I'd also like a pet unicorn and that's what I'm working for but the world is what it is

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    In what world is it easier to kill all billionaires than to redistribute the economy? And keep in mind how often this would have to happen for your fear based system to remain in place.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    Wouldn't be fear based if rid of them

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    Do you really think people will stop increasing their net worth forever if you kill all current billionaires once?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    Do you really think we should let that happen do you think we shouldn't ever put out fires just because other flammable stuff exists you're really stretching to justify doing nothing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    Making stuff non flammable is a better solution that putting out constant fires

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    So we shouldn't have fire fighters

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments