How many times is Zenz used as a source, directly or indirectly, in that article?

i'll restate my comment using a copy/paste of different comment:

the freedom of information act provides a quick & easy litmus test for things like this – and human rights watch fails it.

since 1979, the freedom of information act has been proving that the western characterization of north korea as a hermit kingdom with despotic rulers was american manufactured propaganda – and almost 50 years later, human rights watch still believes the propaganda somehow.

this isn’t some random conspiracy theory – this is the american 👏 fucking 👏 government 👏 itself effectively admitting it to the public and in writing almost a half century ago that they manufactured this propaganda, but human rights watch still believes in this propaganda anyways so there’s no reason to listen to what they have to say about china.