▲ 34 ▼ Biden Backs Out on Campaign Promise, Announces Expansion of US-Mexico Border Wall (peoplesdispatch.org) submitted 2 years ago by shreddy_scientist@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml 16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Hyggyldy@sffa.community -5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Fucking why? permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MishMash@lemm.ee 36 points 2 years ago (2 children) There were funds appropriated for a portion of the wall in 2019 by Trump with the requirement that construction is completed by the end of 2023. Biden asked congress to reappropriate the funds, as he does not have the power to do so, and congress refused. His hands are mostly tied here from what I understand. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Ok, so it's a nothing burger headline designed for rage. I hate the algorithm. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Hyggyldy@sffa.community -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children) Sounds like bs to me. He had to waive laws to do this. And if he didn't do this what would happen? Would he get in trouble with the super president? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] prd@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sounds like you a passionate about the topic, do some more reading do you can understand. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hyggyldy@sffa.community -2 points 2 years ago (3 children) So you can't tell me what's forcing the president to do this? What repercussions he'd face and from where? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] prd@beehaw.org 5 points 2 years ago Don’t be lazy, if you care so much look it up. The other poster already explained it for you and you chose not to believe it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago "President" is not "King" Money is controlled by Republican Congress. Republican Congress is not controlled by Democrat President. permalink fedilink source parent [+] 4am@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent [–] shiveyarbles@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Your inability to process information provided to you makes any discourse impractical. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hyggyldy@sffa.community 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Cool. You feel better now that you've joined late and got a meaningless jab in? Got that dopamine hit? permalink fedilink source parent [–] sik0fewl@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago Not defending it, since I'm not familiar enough with the topic, but he waived protections provided the laws - not the laws themselves, which must be within his power if he's done it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] halvo317@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Waive laws? Lol. He would get impeached because that's breaking the law. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MishMash@lemm.ee 36 points 2 years ago (2 children) There were funds appropriated for a portion of the wall in 2019 by Trump with the requirement that construction is completed by the end of 2023. Biden asked congress to reappropriate the funds, as he does not have the power to do so, and congress refused. His hands are mostly tied here from what I understand. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Ok, so it's a nothing burger headline designed for rage. I hate the algorithm. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Hyggyldy@sffa.community -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children) Sounds like bs to me. He had to waive laws to do this. And if he didn't do this what would happen? Would he get in trouble with the super president? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] prd@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sounds like you a passionate about the topic, do some more reading do you can understand. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hyggyldy@sffa.community -2 points 2 years ago (3 children) So you can't tell me what's forcing the president to do this? What repercussions he'd face and from where? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] prd@beehaw.org 5 points 2 years ago Don’t be lazy, if you care so much look it up. The other poster already explained it for you and you chose not to believe it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago "President" is not "King" Money is controlled by Republican Congress. Republican Congress is not controlled by Democrat President. permalink fedilink source parent [+] 4am@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent [–] shiveyarbles@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Your inability to process information provided to you makes any discourse impractical. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hyggyldy@sffa.community 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Cool. You feel better now that you've joined late and got a meaningless jab in? Got that dopamine hit? permalink fedilink source parent [–] sik0fewl@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago Not defending it, since I'm not familiar enough with the topic, but he waived protections provided the laws - not the laws themselves, which must be within his power if he's done it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] halvo317@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Waive laws? Lol. He would get impeached because that's breaking the law. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Ok, so it's a nothing burger headline designed for rage. I hate the algorithm. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Hyggyldy@sffa.community -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children) Sounds like bs to me. He had to waive laws to do this. And if he didn't do this what would happen? Would he get in trouble with the super president? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] prd@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sounds like you a passionate about the topic, do some more reading do you can understand. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hyggyldy@sffa.community -2 points 2 years ago (3 children) So you can't tell me what's forcing the president to do this? What repercussions he'd face and from where? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] prd@beehaw.org 5 points 2 years ago Don’t be lazy, if you care so much look it up. The other poster already explained it for you and you chose not to believe it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago "President" is not "King" Money is controlled by Republican Congress. Republican Congress is not controlled by Democrat President. permalink fedilink source parent [+] 4am@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent [–] shiveyarbles@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Your inability to process information provided to you makes any discourse impractical. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hyggyldy@sffa.community 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Cool. You feel better now that you've joined late and got a meaningless jab in? Got that dopamine hit? permalink fedilink source parent [–] sik0fewl@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago Not defending it, since I'm not familiar enough with the topic, but he waived protections provided the laws - not the laws themselves, which must be within his power if he's done it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] halvo317@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Waive laws? Lol. He would get impeached because that's breaking the law. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] prd@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sounds like you a passionate about the topic, do some more reading do you can understand. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hyggyldy@sffa.community -2 points 2 years ago (3 children) So you can't tell me what's forcing the president to do this? What repercussions he'd face and from where? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] prd@beehaw.org 5 points 2 years ago Don’t be lazy, if you care so much look it up. The other poster already explained it for you and you chose not to believe it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago "President" is not "King" Money is controlled by Republican Congress. Republican Congress is not controlled by Democrat President. permalink fedilink source parent [+] 4am@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Hyggyldy@sffa.community -2 points 2 years ago (3 children) So you can't tell me what's forcing the president to do this? What repercussions he'd face and from where? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] prd@beehaw.org 5 points 2 years ago Don’t be lazy, if you care so much look it up. The other poster already explained it for you and you chose not to believe it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago "President" is not "King" Money is controlled by Republican Congress. Republican Congress is not controlled by Democrat President. permalink fedilink source parent [+] 4am@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] prd@beehaw.org 5 points 2 years ago Don’t be lazy, if you care so much look it up. The other poster already explained it for you and you chose not to believe it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago "President" is not "King" Money is controlled by Republican Congress. Republican Congress is not controlled by Democrat President. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shiveyarbles@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Your inability to process information provided to you makes any discourse impractical. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hyggyldy@sffa.community 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Cool. You feel better now that you've joined late and got a meaningless jab in? Got that dopamine hit? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Hyggyldy@sffa.community 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Cool. You feel better now that you've joined late and got a meaningless jab in? Got that dopamine hit? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sik0fewl@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago Not defending it, since I'm not familiar enough with the topic, but he waived protections provided the laws - not the laws themselves, which must be within his power if he's done it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] halvo317@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago Waive laws? Lol. He would get impeached because that's breaking the law. permalink fedilink source parent