▲ 1190 ▼ YouTube now (discuss.online) submitted 3 months ago by VetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 89 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] itsjustachairmary@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (3 children) It's unreliable from what I have read permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 3 months ago (2 children) Of course it is, because YouTube doesn't provide the data so it is forced to derive the rating only from people who use that extension. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] bilb@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 months ago I'd always wondered how that worked. permalink fedilink source parent [–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago (1 child) Oh no! I thought it accessed some YouTube API that exposed the dislike data, but of course even if it did that, that data wouldn’t have dislikes from people that don’t have the extension! The point is I’m now even more heartbroken about the loss of the Neutral video’s balance. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 months ago (1 child) My understanding is that It works by storing number of likes and dislikes and computes a ratio then extrapolates it using the number of likes provided by YouTube API. Here what their site says: https://www.returnyoutubedislike.com/faq permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 1 point 3 months ago That’s pretty good actually. permalink fedilink source parent [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago It's not exact, but it's still a useful indicator. permalink fedilink source parent [–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago Well, I wouldn't say unreliable. It does not match the real dislike count, because it only knows about the people using the extension. It's like the difference between the official rating of an app on the google play store and some third party user review site. It's not that one is more reliable than other, just different people contribute. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 3 months ago (2 children) Of course it is, because YouTube doesn't provide the data so it is forced to derive the rating only from people who use that extension. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] bilb@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 months ago I'd always wondered how that worked. permalink fedilink source parent [–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago (1 child) Oh no! I thought it accessed some YouTube API that exposed the dislike data, but of course even if it did that, that data wouldn’t have dislikes from people that don’t have the extension! The point is I’m now even more heartbroken about the loss of the Neutral video’s balance. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 months ago (1 child) My understanding is that It works by storing number of likes and dislikes and computes a ratio then extrapolates it using the number of likes provided by YouTube API. Here what their site says: https://www.returnyoutubedislike.com/faq permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 1 point 3 months ago That’s pretty good actually. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bilb@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 months ago I'd always wondered how that worked. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago (1 child) Oh no! I thought it accessed some YouTube API that exposed the dislike data, but of course even if it did that, that data wouldn’t have dislikes from people that don’t have the extension! The point is I’m now even more heartbroken about the loss of the Neutral video’s balance. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 months ago (1 child) My understanding is that It works by storing number of likes and dislikes and computes a ratio then extrapolates it using the number of likes provided by YouTube API. Here what their site says: https://www.returnyoutubedislike.com/faq permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 1 point 3 months ago That’s pretty good actually. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 months ago (1 child) My understanding is that It works by storing number of likes and dislikes and computes a ratio then extrapolates it using the number of likes provided by YouTube API. Here what their site says: https://www.returnyoutubedislike.com/faq permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 1 point 3 months ago That’s pretty good actually. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 1 point 3 months ago That’s pretty good actually. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago It's not exact, but it's still a useful indicator. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago Well, I wouldn't say unreliable. It does not match the real dislike count, because it only knows about the people using the extension. It's like the difference between the official rating of an app on the google play store and some third party user review site. It's not that one is more reliable than other, just different people contribute. permalink fedilink source parent