▲ 1190 ▼ YouTube now (discuss.online) submitted 3 months ago by VetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 89 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] U7826391786239@piefed.zip 76 points 3 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Triumph@fedia.io 28 points 3 months ago (1 child) Any detail will do that, really. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Z3k3@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago Doesn't need to be a small org. The results tend to go to line managers who know all their team anyway permalink fedilink source parent [–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 13 points 3 months ago* I've sat in mid and upper level executive meetings about this stuff. They 100% know exactly who did what review, it's not secret no matter how much they swear up and down it is, if you're high enough in the chain. Lower middle management won't be told who it was generally, especially if their report size is a handful. They still know exactly what was inputted though because they see the responses and can generally tell who it was based on that alone due to context hints. Always creates a fun bit of drama, but they really don't like that their dirty laundry gets aired. permalink fedilink source parent [–] fartographer@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago Who is this complaint about? Them What is this complaint regarding? Ugly When did this incident occur? Always Did you try finding a solution? No too ugly What action do you suggest could help resolve this conflict? Shut up Your concerns are always anonymous, but would you like to leave your name in case someone needs to follow up with you? Your ugly mom permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Triumph@fedia.io 28 points 3 months ago (1 child) Any detail will do that, really. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Z3k3@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago Doesn't need to be a small org. The results tend to go to line managers who know all their team anyway permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Z3k3@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago Doesn't need to be a small org. The results tend to go to line managers who know all their team anyway permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 13 points 3 months ago* I've sat in mid and upper level executive meetings about this stuff. They 100% know exactly who did what review, it's not secret no matter how much they swear up and down it is, if you're high enough in the chain. Lower middle management won't be told who it was generally, especially if their report size is a handful. They still know exactly what was inputted though because they see the responses and can generally tell who it was based on that alone due to context hints. Always creates a fun bit of drama, but they really don't like that their dirty laundry gets aired. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago Who is this complaint about? Them What is this complaint regarding? Ugly When did this incident occur? Always Did you try finding a solution? No too ugly What action do you suggest could help resolve this conflict? Shut up Your concerns are always anonymous, but would you like to leave your name in case someone needs to follow up with you? Your ugly mom permalink fedilink source parent