▲ 460 ▼ sunset (lemmy.blahaj.zone) submitted 3 months ago by not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/memes@lemmy.world 47 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Dequei@piefed.social 20 points 3 months ago (2 children) Ai.... permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 months ago For sure the rightmost image is AI: Zero correlation between the painted lines and where cars are parked (yes, more so than IRL) Shopping cart on left side is melding with car, shopping cart on right side doesn't match the angle of the guy pushing No texture variation on the road paint or asphalt, despite being a parking lot in a place that presumably gets snow/ice. permalink fedilink source parent [–] cepelinas@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 months ago (1 child) Probably I checked with an ai image detector (I don't know if there are good ones I should use) it said that ml detector had a 93 procent suspision on the whole image not cropped, but I think it just doesn't like memes because this had a 76 procent detection from the same ml detector, but on a regular photo I took only 35 procent, but tbf the image was processed by gcam and one of the issues was skin too smooth/perfect. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 child) AI-powered AI detectors are rarely much better than chance. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cepelinas@sopuli.xyz 0 points 3 months ago There is a reason they use like 16 methods or something like that, I just focused on that because that was the most prone to false alarms. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 months ago For sure the rightmost image is AI: Zero correlation between the painted lines and where cars are parked (yes, more so than IRL) Shopping cart on left side is melding with car, shopping cart on right side doesn't match the angle of the guy pushing No texture variation on the road paint or asphalt, despite being a parking lot in a place that presumably gets snow/ice. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cepelinas@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 months ago (1 child) Probably I checked with an ai image detector (I don't know if there are good ones I should use) it said that ml detector had a 93 procent suspision on the whole image not cropped, but I think it just doesn't like memes because this had a 76 procent detection from the same ml detector, but on a regular photo I took only 35 procent, but tbf the image was processed by gcam and one of the issues was skin too smooth/perfect. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 child) AI-powered AI detectors are rarely much better than chance. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cepelinas@sopuli.xyz 0 points 3 months ago There is a reason they use like 16 methods or something like that, I just focused on that because that was the most prone to false alarms. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 child) AI-powered AI detectors are rarely much better than chance. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cepelinas@sopuli.xyz 0 points 3 months ago There is a reason they use like 16 methods or something like that, I just focused on that because that was the most prone to false alarms. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cepelinas@sopuli.xyz 0 points 3 months ago There is a reason they use like 16 methods or something like that, I just focused on that because that was the most prone to false alarms. permalink fedilink source parent
