613
Man on a mission (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 months ago by to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
68 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -13 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Wow, that's so funny how that guy made the joke about raping those dead sex workers' bodies. What a mad lad and one of the boys.

This is why people don't like men.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    No no. This is why people don't like you.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [+] -7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Man, it would be really hilarious if someone named "mechoman" got raped by an out of control robot. That would be fucking hilarious.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    Yes, it's a disgusting joke, but it's no more possible to rape a dead body than it is to for JD Vance to rape his couch. It's no more possible to rape a dead body than it is to kill a dead body.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Why men* don't like me.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    As an individual on the Internet that has no idea if your gender, to me you're just a text (which I am to you as well).

    Point being, you sound absolutely fucking insufferable, regardless of gender, you sound like a terrible personality to deal with, which is unfortunate. You should strive to be better than what you hate.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I'm pretty sure if we took a look at all the people down voting you some of them will be women. (Or any other gender other than men)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Honestly fucking doubt it, have you seen this site? Even then, internalized misogyny and transmisogyny is a thing. I also don't give a shit if they are.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    Right. But you do care about other things like them banning step-bro porn in the UK. That is something you're apparently ok with.

    So which is it? When they're against something they're good but if they're doing something you don't like they're libs?

    You do realize that the same people banning the porn that you dislike are the same people that don't like transgenders either.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Is this comment meant for another thread...? I don't know what the sweet shit you're referring to. Nowhere here or anywhere have I said anything in support of porn bans.

    Is this written with like, the assumption that being anti-misogyny is somehow synonymous with being pro-state? Either you've got the brainrot from all the bots that feed you your own viewpoints all the time, or this is seriously meant for someone else.

    Feminists are often anti-porn on the basis of challenging the male gaze and recognition of the inherent coercion within a capitalist system eroding the ability of women to consent... is that what you think you're referring to? I agree with these feminist views, but they in no way directly correlate with something like the anti-porn ban in the UK, exactly because it is obviously puritanical in nature and therefore patriarchal.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    You have a very clear and consistent pattern in your responses. I’m not going to dig through your comments again to pull specific examples of where you opposed the porn ban.

    My point is your hypocrisy, it’s been consistent from your very first comment in this exchange.

    You repeatedly place blame on men for a wide range of issues, while going out of your way to emphasize that you’re not from the United States. Then you pivot into ongoing gender-based talking points, which come across as an attempt to justify what is, frankly, a weak position. There are more women than men globally, yet you still default to framing men as the problem in nearly every context.

    Which brings us back to the core issue: people generally don’t like you.

    More importantly, it seems like you intentionally provoke these kinds of exchanges because you enjoy this type of discourse.

    Another user called you insufferable. I agree.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Lmfao, you're shadowboxing yourself. I never even mentioned porn, so I know you're just assuming these things because you're pissed at other women, and I can only deduce you're making up shit they say too.

    Weirdest exchange I've had on here tbh, I don't think I've had anyone genuinely try to fight me over shit they made up about what other people have said.

    Women love me, and I don't give a shit about men hating me. You're wondering why you're an incel? It's because you clearly don't see them as people. Only way to stop seeing people like me is to stay inside off the internet forever or kill yourself, you can pick whichever.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I don’t think anyone really likes you. I imagine you serve some function in society, so people who work with you tolerate you to some extent. But like you? I doubt it very much.

    And this whole “incel” narrative you’re pulling out of thin air is genuinely impressive in its absurdity. Please, I encourage you to continue digging your own sexist hole.

    There’s nothing strange about this exchange, you’re just not used to someone calling you out directly. I assume you’re more accustomed to surrounding yourself with yes-men… or yes-women. Yes-people? I’m not sure.

    Maybe in another life you would have fit right in with figures like Putin… or Trump.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Ragebait elsewhere

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [+] -8 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Wasn't rage bait tbh, serious disgust I have for men like this and also you.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Who gives a shit what you do or don't have disgust for. Go be disgusted somewhere else.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Make me.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Just so you know, I am not one of the downvotes, but I still strongly disagree with your comment and it rubbed me the wrong way.

    The asking for directions "to stay away" is a running joke that (I think) originated in "It's always sunny in Philadelphia" and neither in the show, nor at any other point does this running joke make fun of the victims, it specifically makes fun of the hypocrisy of the statements.

    The late sex workers are not the butt of the joke and so I strongly believe that your disgust is misplaced.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)

    You're trying to add nuance so this will probably not go over well in this dumpster fire of a comment thread, but you are correct. The butt of the joke is the person asking the questions because they look like a creep/pervert/overly horny. This is a form of self-deprecating humor on part of the original commenter in the screenshot, but apparently the internet is still where humor goes to die.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    The butt of the joke is the person asking the questions because they look like a creap/pervert/overly horny.

    Sure, but people explicitly use the excuse of "it was just a joke" to cover for bigotry and to (successfully) move the Overton Window right.

    On the internet, it's a coin toss as to whether or not the person posting that was poking fun at themself (or a fictional version of themself) like you say

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] -8 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Cool, are you a woman?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Why does it have to matter?

    But no, I am not.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I already knew you weren't. Could you explain how you think you're in a position to determine if something is misogynistic? Like, you believe that you can tell women they aren't harmed by a thing? Why? What are the consequences of this assertion that diminishes the voice of women?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •