The world’s No. 1 bro-caster, who has expressed some buyer’s remorse over his endorsement of Trump, stood directly behind the president, who was seated at the Resolute Desk in the Oval Office signing an executive order to ease restrictions on medical research and treatments using psychedelic drugs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I asked you, after you stated it’s “a W,” to help me understand your thinking. I’ve already given reasons why I think this is neutral at best.

Why do you consider this to be a good thing, after what you’ve seen them do to “science” and “health?”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago*

    Come now, it's better. Just as breakbone fever is better than malaria. Our country has been permanently seized by gangsters. And your countries are next. Which is not better. We are doomed, doomed I tell you. Unless we organize obviously.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Yes, I did read your comment before replying to it. You explained nothing. I don't know how to explain how legalization of readily available an inexpensive methods that have been proven to treat mental illnesses for decades being even considered for legalization is obviously a W.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    Can you help me understand how you got to “legalization?”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    It's in the article:

    The executive order directs the Food and Drug Administration to support clinical trials for psychedelics and speed up the process to approve drugs deemed to be safe and effective , including ibogaine, psilocybin, MDMA and LSD, all of which are illegal in the United States.

    I'm not sure what other way you could interpret that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Oh ok well if it’s in the article, that must mean MAGA will just do a great job

    Thanks for pointing that out

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    Of course it doesn't mean that, that's why I didn't say that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I still don’t get “the W”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments