you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 42 points 3 months ago (1 child)

He was dying. This would likely have given him more time but not stopped him from dying in the near future. To an insurance company, these results are the same except that the latter case costs them more money.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 74 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    You are also dying in the future. So no treatment for you. It's even cheaper the sooner you die. And since you don't need money after you've died, lets make your last days so expensive that we can extract all the money from you and if possible from the rest of your family. Profit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Whoa whoa whoa. We can't just let people die until we've extracted their economic output, up to the point where the cost of the treatment exceeds expected remaining economic output.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments