4
(Rant) Linux really needs to do a better job with package management... (lemmy.zip)
submitted 3 months ago by to c/linux@lemmy.world
44 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A sample journey when trying to install software:

  • Try your distros repos, it’s either not there or an older version
  • Oh wait, you need to add their repo to your list and try again
  • Actually, they don’t have a repo, but you can install this deb/rpm from their site
  • Nevermind, it actually needs to be installed with pip to get the latest version
  • Or wait, it was actually a rust package and needs cargo
  • Well, this package is available as a snap
  • Screw it, I’ll just build it from source…. Except the dependencies I need take me through the entire journey again

It’s crazy with a large package like mesa. It uses meson, which requires it be installed via pip, and also needs rust which is best installed via a snap, but then there are dependencies it needs that require multiple paths…

On Windows: find the msi or exe and be done with it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

I install my OS and gui with system packages (minimal setup mostly) and everything else with flatpaks. It's not perfect. There's bloat and cleanup evolved, and some packages I didn't trust. And sometimes you still need to build an app from source. But it fixed a bunch of issues you mentioned. It's also nice to limit permissions on apps.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Yeah, plus one for Flatpaks here as well! A good way to keep up-to-date apps on a 'stable' distro. I use Debian and am super happy with it as the underlying system, but plenty of applications have fairly old versions in the Debian repos.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent