Flippanarchy

flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

2,693 readers

4,113 active

392 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules

If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text
If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.
Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.
Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.
No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.
This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.
No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.

Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago

moderators

db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com

The paradox of electoralism (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 4 months ago by A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

53 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] nimpnin@sopuli.xyz 1 point 4 months ago

One person does not make decisions, that one person would need to convince everybody else who got selected.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

lemmy:	0.19.20
mlmym (mschae):	26.3.4