▲ 833 ▼ dork dash trans sport mcpizza (lemmy.ca) submitted 3 months ago* by slothrop@lemmy.ca to c/antitrumpalliance@lemmy.world 93 comments fedilink hide all child comments bsky source for vid
[–] Pacrat173@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 months ago (3 children) Snopes has a article if you’d like to read more permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago (3 children) Fuck this website. The internet is shit now with its ads, newsletter pop-ups, notification prompts, and general bullshitery. The internet peaked in 2007. It's all been downhill since. No one wants notifications from your website. No one reads newsletters. No I dont want to make an account. No I dont want to read this other article you suggested. Also, none of the ads you show me are relevant. I miss the older internet. The magic is gone. It's all just capitalist bullshit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago Firefox with ublock origin plugin, solve the ad problems right at the root permanently. After that, using a browser without it will feel gross. permalink fedilink source parent [–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago Use reader mode and uBlock dude permalink fedilink source parent [+] MunkysUnkEnz0@lemmy.world -10 points 3 months ago Use brave browser. It blocks all the ads. permalink fedilink source parent [–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 months ago The fuck, even snopes has Adblock detection now? permalink fedilink source parent [–] daychilde@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 child) It seems like that Snopes article is more about defending them than really addressing how staged the whole thing was. It's rather disappointing. I'm normally decently supportive of Snopes. It's certainly not a "woke pile of bullshit" like fascists love to claim (because it calls out their lies, typically). This article is rather disappointing. I feel like they should have spent a bit more time on just how bullshit the delivery was. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KaChilde@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago (1 child) “Simmons was not a paid actor” according to Simmons, the White House, and Doordash: the three parties who could suffer most if she did turn out to be a paid actor. Snopes is ‘debunking’ theories using press releases from the guilty parties. The language used feels very biased against the allegations. Are Doordash implying that they shipped this woman from her home state to the White House, asking her to take part in a publicity stunt with the president, and NO-ONE paid her for her time? She was clearly hand picked for her opinions on the NTOT thing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Buffalobuffalo@reddthat.com 0 points 3 months ago If she is an actual door dash delivery person expressing her own views on Trumps no tip policy I would say that does not make her a paid actor. It is obvious there was coordination between the White House, DoorDash, and the deliverer. No one’s trying to hide that. DoorDash posted a video of her picking up the order Which they wouldn’t have done if this wasn’t gonna be a thing. The same goes for the shirt and car. We know door dash and Trump paid her, she was working. Personally, I think they should’ve paid her the For the whole trip to Washington. This was clearly a DoorDash advertising Campaign to encourage people to deliver for them and not have to pay taxes on their tips. That’s what people should be upset about. Who cares if this lady is an actor or not, the fact that this is another instance of Donald Trump using his position as president to shill for his donors. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago (3 children) Fuck this website. The internet is shit now with its ads, newsletter pop-ups, notification prompts, and general bullshitery. The internet peaked in 2007. It's all been downhill since. No one wants notifications from your website. No one reads newsletters. No I dont want to make an account. No I dont want to read this other article you suggested. Also, none of the ads you show me are relevant. I miss the older internet. The magic is gone. It's all just capitalist bullshit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago Firefox with ublock origin plugin, solve the ad problems right at the root permanently. After that, using a browser without it will feel gross. permalink fedilink source parent [–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago Use reader mode and uBlock dude permalink fedilink source parent [+] MunkysUnkEnz0@lemmy.world -10 points 3 months ago Use brave browser. It blocks all the ads. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago Firefox with ublock origin plugin, solve the ad problems right at the root permanently. After that, using a browser without it will feel gross. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago Use reader mode and uBlock dude permalink fedilink source parent
[+] MunkysUnkEnz0@lemmy.world -10 points 3 months ago Use brave browser. It blocks all the ads. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 months ago The fuck, even snopes has Adblock detection now? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 child) It seems like that Snopes article is more about defending them than really addressing how staged the whole thing was. It's rather disappointing. I'm normally decently supportive of Snopes. It's certainly not a "woke pile of bullshit" like fascists love to claim (because it calls out their lies, typically). This article is rather disappointing. I feel like they should have spent a bit more time on just how bullshit the delivery was. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KaChilde@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago (1 child) “Simmons was not a paid actor” according to Simmons, the White House, and Doordash: the three parties who could suffer most if she did turn out to be a paid actor. Snopes is ‘debunking’ theories using press releases from the guilty parties. The language used feels very biased against the allegations. Are Doordash implying that they shipped this woman from her home state to the White House, asking her to take part in a publicity stunt with the president, and NO-ONE paid her for her time? She was clearly hand picked for her opinions on the NTOT thing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Buffalobuffalo@reddthat.com 0 points 3 months ago If she is an actual door dash delivery person expressing her own views on Trumps no tip policy I would say that does not make her a paid actor. It is obvious there was coordination between the White House, DoorDash, and the deliverer. No one’s trying to hide that. DoorDash posted a video of her picking up the order Which they wouldn’t have done if this wasn’t gonna be a thing. The same goes for the shirt and car. We know door dash and Trump paid her, she was working. Personally, I think they should’ve paid her the For the whole trip to Washington. This was clearly a DoorDash advertising Campaign to encourage people to deliver for them and not have to pay taxes on their tips. That’s what people should be upset about. Who cares if this lady is an actor or not, the fact that this is another instance of Donald Trump using his position as president to shill for his donors. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KaChilde@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago (1 child) “Simmons was not a paid actor” according to Simmons, the White House, and Doordash: the three parties who could suffer most if she did turn out to be a paid actor. Snopes is ‘debunking’ theories using press releases from the guilty parties. The language used feels very biased against the allegations. Are Doordash implying that they shipped this woman from her home state to the White House, asking her to take part in a publicity stunt with the president, and NO-ONE paid her for her time? She was clearly hand picked for her opinions on the NTOT thing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Buffalobuffalo@reddthat.com 0 points 3 months ago If she is an actual door dash delivery person expressing her own views on Trumps no tip policy I would say that does not make her a paid actor. It is obvious there was coordination between the White House, DoorDash, and the deliverer. No one’s trying to hide that. DoorDash posted a video of her picking up the order Which they wouldn’t have done if this wasn’t gonna be a thing. The same goes for the shirt and car. We know door dash and Trump paid her, she was working. Personally, I think they should’ve paid her the For the whole trip to Washington. This was clearly a DoorDash advertising Campaign to encourage people to deliver for them and not have to pay taxes on their tips. That’s what people should be upset about. Who cares if this lady is an actor or not, the fact that this is another instance of Donald Trump using his position as president to shill for his donors. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Buffalobuffalo@reddthat.com 0 points 3 months ago If she is an actual door dash delivery person expressing her own views on Trumps no tip policy I would say that does not make her a paid actor. It is obvious there was coordination between the White House, DoorDash, and the deliverer. No one’s trying to hide that. DoorDash posted a video of her picking up the order Which they wouldn’t have done if this wasn’t gonna be a thing. The same goes for the shirt and car. We know door dash and Trump paid her, she was working. Personally, I think they should’ve paid her the For the whole trip to Washington. This was clearly a DoorDash advertising Campaign to encourage people to deliver for them and not have to pay taxes on their tips. That’s what people should be upset about. Who cares if this lady is an actor or not, the fact that this is another instance of Donald Trump using his position as president to shill for his donors. permalink fedilink source parent