you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

Because a large part of many of these practices is the exclusion of all others. Thanks for sharing, though!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    They do not want to coexist. The existence of an 'other' is a threat/attack to them.

    Read nazi philosopher carl schmitt or fiction novel 'blindsight'.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago* (1 child)

    If we could come up with an agreement of like maximum land size per person and minimum distance between the next such clan, maybe it could function?

    But then again nobody would be in the fashist clan, and they would not like this idea haha

    What else do you propose?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    Noted elsewhere. Differences will happen. Why make them discrete or sacred?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    How do we achieve anarchist land and life, with preferably 0 bloodshed or prison time?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    I expect the same way you continue as is without any prison or bloodshed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    It is not.

    I am already forced into slavery via work, taxes, and the entire school-school-work-work-work-die way of EXISTING, not living.

    So by doing nothing I am already shoved into a live-like-this box.

    Trying to get out of that box would not go well for anyone.

    Trying to live outside the box would break oh so many laws, rules, from a world I and many do not want to be apart of.

    IS THIS CLEAR ENOUGH? Lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments