2885
logical (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 years ago by [M] to c/nathanwpyle@lemmy.world
467 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 24 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)
[deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    It's not that a system based on base 6 would be strange. That'd be a logical system, too. Just as any other system that consistently uses a particular base.

    However, a system that uses numbers of base whatever but then proceeds to jump from one unit to the next one in completely arbitrarily sized steps such as 3; 22; 10; 8; 3 is illogical in any base.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -6 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Mostly because it's very easy to make calculation on base 10. If i ask you to tell me how many millimeters are in 5.7 meters you could probably reply easily without a calculator. You probably wouldn't do it as easily if it wasn't base 10

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 14 points 3 years ago*

    We define 1000 mm as one meter as we are base 10 centric. If we live in a base 8 world, we would have define 8x8x8 mm as one metre and the answer to 5.7 m base 8 would be 5700mm base 8 too

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    It's not fundamentally easier to do calculations in base 10. It's only easier for us because that's what we learn as children.

    If our number system was based on a superior base, like dozenal or senary, we would be able to do calculations on that base easily and would find working in tens awkward.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] -9 points 3 years ago* (2 children)

    I disagree. Base 10 is innately more intuitive because you move a decimal to shift between orders of magnitude.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [+] -7 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Because it's intuitive. Calculating orders of magnitude is literally just a matter adding or removing significant digits.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 16 points 3 years ago

    That's literally the same way with any other base. We just defined orders of magnitudes to be multiples of 10 because we use base 10. We could just as well have used other multiples.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent